Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheCosmicKid" data-source="post: 6834905" data-attributes="member: 6683613"><p>Yes. The point here is to demonstrate that not every character concept is equally appropriate for every score. Imagine that the players instead rolled for their <em>flaws</em>, and this player got the flaw "I am unintelligent". Clearly the dice would be telling him to pick a different character concept than that of the great detective, right? Well, rolling for ability scores is just rolling for flaws old school. Literally. An Intelligence of 5 <em>is</em> the flaw "I am unintelligent." (The only difference is that the Intelligence score actually has the mechanical ramifications to back up the assertion.) So if a player rolls an Int 5, then the dice are again telling him to pick a different character concept than that of the great detective.</p><p></p><p>Whenever you roll for a part of character creation, whether it be ability scores or traits/bonds/flaws or race/class or anything else, then you are inescapably giving the dice some control over your character concept. If you have a definite character concept in your head beforehand and then struggle against the dice results to implement it, that's a sign you shouldn't have been rolling; you should have opted for a different character creation method where you have the control. When rolling, the key is not to struggle against it, but rather go with the flow and see where it takes you.</p><p></p><p>And I don't want to play mind-reader on the OP too much, but I think this premise is implicit in it. "What would you do if you rolled a 5 for an ability score?" seems to be asking for character concepts to go with that flow. At any rate, I am quite confident that it is <em>not</em> asking for the answer you gave, "Apply a -3 modifier to ability checks related to that ability score." Because if that's all there is to say, then that's the end of the conversation, and what a boring conversation it was.</p><p></p><p>Can I bypass a Strength check by demonstrating to the DM that <em>I</em> can kick down a door?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheCosmicKid, post: 6834905, member: 6683613"] Yes. The point here is to demonstrate that not every character concept is equally appropriate for every score. Imagine that the players instead rolled for their [I]flaws[/I], and this player got the flaw "I am unintelligent". Clearly the dice would be telling him to pick a different character concept than that of the great detective, right? Well, rolling for ability scores is just rolling for flaws old school. Literally. An Intelligence of 5 [I]is[/I] the flaw "I am unintelligent." (The only difference is that the Intelligence score actually has the mechanical ramifications to back up the assertion.) So if a player rolls an Int 5, then the dice are again telling him to pick a different character concept than that of the great detective. Whenever you roll for a part of character creation, whether it be ability scores or traits/bonds/flaws or race/class or anything else, then you are inescapably giving the dice some control over your character concept. If you have a definite character concept in your head beforehand and then struggle against the dice results to implement it, that's a sign you shouldn't have been rolling; you should have opted for a different character creation method where you have the control. When rolling, the key is not to struggle against it, but rather go with the flow and see where it takes you. And I don't want to play mind-reader on the OP too much, but I think this premise is implicit in it. "What would you do if you rolled a 5 for an ability score?" seems to be asking for character concepts to go with that flow. At any rate, I am quite confident that it is [I]not[/I] asking for the answer you gave, "Apply a -3 modifier to ability checks related to that ability score." Because if that's all there is to say, then that's the end of the conversation, and what a boring conversation it was. Can I bypass a Strength check by demonstrating to the DM that [I]I[/I] can kick down a door? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
Top