Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 6845821" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>The difference is 'can a PC physically turn the dial to a random location?' vs. "can the PC figure out which spot on the dial will solve the puzzle?" The answer to the first question is, "clearly, in this case, yes." The answer to the second is, "maybe, needs a roll." This isn't a case of 'turn a dial randomly' being the same as 'turn the dial to a specific point." The question has never been if the PC is physically capable, the question, for me, was is the PC mentally capable of identifying the answer. Of course, if he can, there's no problem turning the dial, but the step of determining the answer is in doubt, and it's not incorrect to question the method of arriving at it and/or calling for a roll to see if it's correct.</p><p></p><p>Now, to say this again, the vast majority of the time I wouldn't blink at this and just let it go. My second possibility would be to look askance and have a word with the player after the game about the meaning of his choices and my expectations in game about honoring those choices. The third option would be to ask for the INT check to see if the declared answer is correct. This would be rarely invoked, and only in a case where I had done the second at least once previously with that player and in the face of a continued behavior to play around the PC's chosen limitations. I certainly wouldn't ask for the check all the time.</p><p></p><p>Now, I don't usually have this problem at all, because my current players and the groups I've played with before wouldn't normally act in the way Iserth presented. Further, I avoid puzzles that have answered so easily guessed out of character, so this also isn't something that I'd actually deal with. So my answers are hypothetical within the narrow corner case identified by Iserth, and are as complete as I can make them, and presented honestly to the best of my ability. If anyone thinks that I'm intentionally evading the answer, they're wrong, but I would be very curious to hear from them why they think I would evade and what I would gain from doing so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 6845821, member: 16814"] The difference is 'can a PC physically turn the dial to a random location?' vs. "can the PC figure out which spot on the dial will solve the puzzle?" The answer to the first question is, "clearly, in this case, yes." The answer to the second is, "maybe, needs a roll." This isn't a case of 'turn a dial randomly' being the same as 'turn the dial to a specific point." The question has never been if the PC is physically capable, the question, for me, was is the PC mentally capable of identifying the answer. Of course, if he can, there's no problem turning the dial, but the step of determining the answer is in doubt, and it's not incorrect to question the method of arriving at it and/or calling for a roll to see if it's correct. Now, to say this again, the vast majority of the time I wouldn't blink at this and just let it go. My second possibility would be to look askance and have a word with the player after the game about the meaning of his choices and my expectations in game about honoring those choices. The third option would be to ask for the INT check to see if the declared answer is correct. This would be rarely invoked, and only in a case where I had done the second at least once previously with that player and in the face of a continued behavior to play around the PC's chosen limitations. I certainly wouldn't ask for the check all the time. Now, I don't usually have this problem at all, because my current players and the groups I've played with before wouldn't normally act in the way Iserth presented. Further, I avoid puzzles that have answered so easily guessed out of character, so this also isn't something that I'd actually deal with. So my answers are hypothetical within the narrow corner case identified by Iserth, and are as complete as I can make them, and presented honestly to the best of my ability. If anyone thinks that I'm intentionally evading the answer, they're wrong, but I would be very curious to hear from them why they think I would evade and what I would gain from doing so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So 5 Intelligence Huh
Top