Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, 5e OGL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6305517" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>Right...your last sentence is proof OGLs extend the life of a prior edition, which makes the community splits more intense and the ability to transition to a new edition that much harder each time. Also, had you continued you would have been a voice to others to stay with 1e, perhaps peeling off others on the fence between 1e and 2e to stay with 2e. You might have also been a voice for edition warring, fracturing the community more. From WOTCs (or in this hypothetical, TSRs) perspective, you stopping D&D at that point is BETTER for them than you continuing with an edition that makes them zero money and also potentially lures others away from buying things that make them money, and making the community more negative in general for discussions of things that make them money. Unification under a edition they make money off of, is always in their better interest than splits between things that do and do not make them money.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody is talking about forcing anyone to do anything at all. Continued support is incentive to continue with the prior game for many. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know where you're getting this idea of anyone being forced to do something, but it is a strawman.</p><p></p><p>More importantly, you seem to be mistaking my argument that is intended to help people understand WOTCs perspective, as my own opinion as a fan. I don't know how many more times I can say "This is WOTCs perspective, not the perspective of fans or third parties" but I guess I need to keep saying that as long as people confuse it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think many people like to play a supported game, and that level of support is important to them. So all things being equal they will continue to play the game they are currently playing, but if support ends for it and starts for something new, they will turn to the something new for the support.</p><p></p><p>I will give you another example - I am just now moving on from Windows XP, because support just ended. I would have stuck with XP for quite a while more, had they not ended support. This is just how many people are - why stop a good thing, unless it's no longer as good a thing?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody said huge majority. This is all an issue of material numbers of people peeling off with each edition, not majorities. Remember, it's INDEFINITE. It will never end. 100 years from now, this will still be an issue. Each new edition, it will continue to get worse. It never ends, making it a horrible decision from WOTCs position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6305517, member: 2525"] Right...your last sentence is proof OGLs extend the life of a prior edition, which makes the community splits more intense and the ability to transition to a new edition that much harder each time. Also, had you continued you would have been a voice to others to stay with 1e, perhaps peeling off others on the fence between 1e and 2e to stay with 2e. You might have also been a voice for edition warring, fracturing the community more. From WOTCs (or in this hypothetical, TSRs) perspective, you stopping D&D at that point is BETTER for them than you continuing with an edition that makes them zero money and also potentially lures others away from buying things that make them money, and making the community more negative in general for discussions of things that make them money. Unification under a edition they make money off of, is always in their better interest than splits between things that do and do not make them money. Nobody is talking about forcing anyone to do anything at all. Continued support is incentive to continue with the prior game for many. I don't know where you're getting this idea of anyone being forced to do something, but it is a strawman. More importantly, you seem to be mistaking my argument that is intended to help people understand WOTCs perspective, as my own opinion as a fan. I don't know how many more times I can say "This is WOTCs perspective, not the perspective of fans or third parties" but I guess I need to keep saying that as long as people confuse it. I think many people like to play a supported game, and that level of support is important to them. So all things being equal they will continue to play the game they are currently playing, but if support ends for it and starts for something new, they will turn to the something new for the support. I will give you another example - I am just now moving on from Windows XP, because support just ended. I would have stuck with XP for quite a while more, had they not ended support. This is just how many people are - why stop a good thing, unless it's no longer as good a thing? Nobody said huge majority. This is all an issue of material numbers of people peeling off with each edition, not majorities. Remember, it's INDEFINITE. It will never end. 100 years from now, this will still be an issue. Each new edition, it will continue to get worse. It never ends, making it a horrible decision from WOTCs position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, 5e OGL
Top