Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, 5e OGL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nellisir" data-source="post: 6306897" data-attributes="member: 70"><p>WotC's interaction with the OGL is a little bit different from everyone else's. </p><p></p><p>One way to think about it is that there are two chains of ownership. One is D&D, the other is the SRD. They are not the same.</p><p>WOtC has D&D. Lock, stock, and barrel. 3e, 4e, 5e, etc. WotC is under no OGL requirements regarding D&D because they own it.</p><p></p><p>WotC also put out the SRD under the OGL.</p><p>The SRD is derived from D&D, but is not D&D. If you're using material from the SRD, basically you shouldn't ever look at a D&D book.</p><p>The OGL allows other people to use material from the SRD, but they must accredit the source (in Section 15), include the OGL, and anything derived from OGC must also be OGC (so if you invent a new game mechanic, it's not required to be OGC. Hero point systems were often not declared OGC.)</p><p>The OGL does not require you to give up copyright (indeed, you have to have copyright to agree to the license); it's a license that lets other people use your copyrighted material so long as they do so under the same license you did (the OGL). </p><p>If WotC wanted to use someone else's OGC, they would have to use the OGL, or reach an independent agreement with the copyright holders.</p><p></p><p>Since WotC essentially* never used anyone else's OGC, they really just shared outward/downstream. </p><p></p><p>I suppose normal OGL use could be considered a transaction; I think of sharing as a two-way street (otherwise it's just giving) in which both parties voluntarily give the other something. The upstream OGL user is sharing blindly downstream - they have no idea who will reuse their material. I guess that's what differentiates it from a transaction in my mind.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, it's all minor nitpick stuff and I'll shut up about it.</p><p></p><p>*I know there were two monsters in the FF or MM2 or something, and maybe a little bit here and there, but overall? Nothing.</p><p></p><p><strong>Edit: OK, so my original point in response to the original post about WotC not giving away ALL of their intellectual property: WotC still owns all of their intellectual property. They do not control the reproduction of the game mechanics that were released under the OGL so long as they are reproduced under the OGL, but WotC still owns the property. It's not in the public realm.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nellisir, post: 6306897, member: 70"] WotC's interaction with the OGL is a little bit different from everyone else's. One way to think about it is that there are two chains of ownership. One is D&D, the other is the SRD. They are not the same. WOtC has D&D. Lock, stock, and barrel. 3e, 4e, 5e, etc. WotC is under no OGL requirements regarding D&D because they own it. WotC also put out the SRD under the OGL. The SRD is derived from D&D, but is not D&D. If you're using material from the SRD, basically you shouldn't ever look at a D&D book. The OGL allows other people to use material from the SRD, but they must accredit the source (in Section 15), include the OGL, and anything derived from OGC must also be OGC (so if you invent a new game mechanic, it's not required to be OGC. Hero point systems were often not declared OGC.) The OGL does not require you to give up copyright (indeed, you have to have copyright to agree to the license); it's a license that lets other people use your copyrighted material so long as they do so under the same license you did (the OGL). If WotC wanted to use someone else's OGC, they would have to use the OGL, or reach an independent agreement with the copyright holders. Since WotC essentially* never used anyone else's OGC, they really just shared outward/downstream. I suppose normal OGL use could be considered a transaction; I think of sharing as a two-way street (otherwise it's just giving) in which both parties voluntarily give the other something. The upstream OGL user is sharing blindly downstream - they have no idea who will reuse their material. I guess that's what differentiates it from a transaction in my mind. Anyways, it's all minor nitpick stuff and I'll shut up about it. *I know there were two monsters in the FF or MM2 or something, and maybe a little bit here and there, but overall? Nothing. [B]Edit: OK, so my original point in response to the original post about WotC not giving away ALL of their intellectual property: WotC still owns all of their intellectual property. They do not control the reproduction of the game mechanics that were released under the OGL so long as they are reproduced under the OGL, but WotC still owns the property. It's not in the public realm.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, 5e OGL
Top