Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nellisir" data-source="post: 6380598" data-attributes="member: 70">Yep.Yes, that's what I said. So you've shut off maybe a handful of companies; ten tops. So what? Those are the ones that WotC could do separate licenses with anyways.Yes, and I don't think there's going to be the same amount of turmoil this time. It's a totally different climate.A fan-license or electronic-only are possibilities. I don't think either of them in their simplest form is actually what WotC is going to do.There are any number of other ways WotC can put the brakes on* 3rd-party products other than a sunset clause. I suggest different ones each time I write this stuff out; I'm kinda tired of it actually.&nbsp; *I don't mean stop, and I don't mean WotC wants to kill 3rd-party products. I suspect that WotC actually wants a lively amateur/low-pro ecosystem. They just want it a little more restrained than last time.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nellisir, post: 6380598, member: 70"] Yep. Yes, that's what I said. So you've shut off maybe a handful of companies; ten tops. So what? Those are the ones that WotC could do separate licenses with anyways. Yes, and I don't think there's going to be the same amount of turmoil this time. It's a totally different climate. A fan-license or electronic-only are [I]possibilities[/I]. I don't think either of them in their simplest form is actually what WotC is going to do.There are any number of other ways WotC can put the brakes on* 3rd-party products other than a sunset clause. I suggest different ones each time I write this stuff out; I'm kinda tired of it actually. *I don't mean stop, and I don't mean WotC wants to kill 3rd-party products. I suspect that WotC actually [I]wants[/I] a lively amateur/low-pro ecosystem. They just want it a little more restrained than last time. [/QUOTE]

Verification