Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 6637969" data-attributes="member: 67338">I right now wish I had ignored the person who quoted me, I really do this thread does no one any good... sighfine I will try again to not be misreprented...re read what I wrote, instead of interesting systems they all would just use the more popular open source system... so again great way to miss the point. wait what?I can't say something is wrong or harmful based on my experience??? OK, so then in what context can ANYTHING EVERY be called wrong or harmful if we have to ignore the people who proclaim it did harm or was wrong???I am not anti choice, that is something you are making up. I never said you can't play 3.5, or 2e, or basic D&D, or pathfinder or candy land... stop misrepresenting what I am saying!To make it clear, Pathfinder found a market (People who had not yet moved on). Historically that market would get smaller and smaller each year, but never fully disappear (people still play 1e). There choice was to go for that market (Hey look one of those choices I hate so much...) that choice had an affect (by the way the affect is the real problem in case you actually want to understand my POV). Every edition has it's warriors, and I have lived through 2e becoming 2e+options both of them going into 3e (witch in my mind is the biggest change in any edtion) and 3e going to 3.5 and 3.5 going to 4e, and 4e going to 5e. so why did piazo v wotc become the one that was the loudest???yea except I was part of the pathfinder playtest (the free one I don't pay for beta) and got pretty much no where. ANd when I was playing 4e I never went to pathfinder threads... but somehow I kept getting into fights with pro pathfinder people... and 3 times at conventions I was harassed for having the wrong book (4e)...so sorry it was at least HARMFUL if not wrong... it CAUSED HARM</blockquote>

Verification