Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6683600" data-attributes="member: 7006">What metrics are you using to determine what would &quot;harm&quot; WotC's sales?&nbsp; That's just as an amorphous term you're throwing out as the word &quot;effective&quot; you used before.&nbsp; No &quot;harm&quot; by what standards?&nbsp; The OGL from the beginning of 5E's existance would be more &quot;effective&quot; for WotC by what standards?&nbsp; You're making claims here but not actually backing them up.The fact that you happen to be one of those 3PP studios that wanted to release content from the very beginning of WotC's 5E lifespan makes your opinions on the matter less than objective.&nbsp; You can claim WotC would have been better off... but in truth, it's you and other designers like you who truly would have been better off because you'd be actually selling things right now, rather than not selling anything.&nbsp; So it's very hard to take your statements on the situation at face-value.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6683600, member: 7006"] What metrics are you using to determine what would "harm" WotC's sales? That's just as an amorphous term you're throwing out as the word "effective" you used before. No "harm" by what standards? The OGL from the beginning of 5E's existance would be more "effective" for WotC by what standards? You're making claims here but not actually backing them up. The fact that you happen to be one of those 3PP studios that wanted to release content from the very beginning of WotC's 5E lifespan makes your opinions on the matter less than objective. You can claim WotC would have been better off... but in truth, it's you and other designers like you who [i]truly[/i] would have been better off because you'd be actually selling things right now, rather than not selling anything. So it's very hard to take your statements on the situation at face-value. [/QUOTE]

Verification