Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 6686182" data-attributes="member: 10479">You're kinda misstating things here again.  If someone utilized the SRD to create some material and then goes on and add some OGC whole cloth within it, yes everything in their Section 15 would need to also be cited in any subsequent Section 15 that used any OGC from that source.  That doesn't mean the subsequent document actually has to use anything from the SRD.  One might also use in that same document some OGC from a source that didn't cite the SRD because it hadn't used anything from the SRD nor any source that had either, and yes, in that case the subsequent document would include the citation(s) from that Section 15 in its Section 15 as well.  But what you are trying to say is that you know of precious few documents that use the OGL that haven't cited the SRD, not that there are precious few nor that you know with any certainty how much actual OGC is in any document that was derived from OGC in the SRD.  It's a distinction from which I think you might want to steer away while unclear on that distinction.Dude, it's starting to wear thin how you project your own experience on "most" folks.  I get that you don't really understand what you are discussing.  It's been pointed out repeatedly in this thread by more and more people.  We can have this discussion without you invoking the masses in your corner.  When I say 'most folks I know' it means folks I actually know.  When you drop the word "most" you use it as a way that assumes folks are out there somewhere with your same experience without actually knowing if they exist to validate your claims.  It's really not panning out the deeper into this discussion we get.  Let's set that aside and move on.  It's a faulty premise and the conclusions you assert from it lose their credibility.</blockquote>

Verification