Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, about defenses aka. PHB2 defenses feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 4740724" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>We just see things VERY differently. The way I see it you guys are having a problem not because the game is somehow broken, but because you are putting a lopsided emphasis on only one aspect of play. Of course if the only way to succeed is by slagging monsters in situations where the only options are which powers to blast things with then you have created this problem. It isn't a problem that is inherent to the rules system.</p><p></p><p>Try creating adventures where the ultimate encounter is a level + 4 skill challenge. It is just as much a high difficulty encounter as throwing the most brutal possible monsters at the party, but as the rules are written your super combat expert characters WILL FAIL. They should fail because they are one sided characters and the reason they're one sided is that that's all they were ever asked to do! Every problem's solution that they ever faced was whipping out their trusty brutal superaxe and hacking things up.</p><p></p><p>Combat encounters can also involve a lot more stunting opportunities and mixed skill challenge and combat elements instead of just a battlefield with monsters to kill. I'm not saying a good proportion of encounters shouldn't be mainly combat, but a good proportion should be the other type too.</p><p></p><p>When you simply give everyone all the various numbers that your totally combat-dominated games require, you're solving your adventure design issue, but what about the type of game I'm talking about? It would be unplayable by your approach since the characters will certainly have all the skills they need, given that they got every combat benny for free.</p><p></p><p>I think at least a part of the blame for this rests with the 4e designers, especially WRT the DMG. They did pay lip service to non-combat elements of the game, but they failed to emphasize that these needed to be just as critical as combat. The various module authors have followed suite and pretty much created canned adventures that always revolve around mostly only what you can do with your sword. I'm sure it requires a lot less thought and creativity to build adventures like that, and they simplify play, but that doesn't make them superior game design.</p><p></p><p>Good 4e REALLY requires a LOT from DMs in terms of adventure design. Just like it requires a lot from players if they want to succeed. I think the vast majority of DMs have just been encouraged to take the easier path, and then it shows up problems. They aren't necessarily problems with the design of 4e. They can also be the result of limited adventure design channeling the party too much in one direction IMHO. I just would be disappointed if the game system itself gets munged into a shape where that is the only way you can play it, and I'm actually glad to see that the 4e core design team seems to understand that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 4740724, member: 82106"] We just see things VERY differently. The way I see it you guys are having a problem not because the game is somehow broken, but because you are putting a lopsided emphasis on only one aspect of play. Of course if the only way to succeed is by slagging monsters in situations where the only options are which powers to blast things with then you have created this problem. It isn't a problem that is inherent to the rules system. Try creating adventures where the ultimate encounter is a level + 4 skill challenge. It is just as much a high difficulty encounter as throwing the most brutal possible monsters at the party, but as the rules are written your super combat expert characters WILL FAIL. They should fail because they are one sided characters and the reason they're one sided is that that's all they were ever asked to do! Every problem's solution that they ever faced was whipping out their trusty brutal superaxe and hacking things up. Combat encounters can also involve a lot more stunting opportunities and mixed skill challenge and combat elements instead of just a battlefield with monsters to kill. I'm not saying a good proportion of encounters shouldn't be mainly combat, but a good proportion should be the other type too. When you simply give everyone all the various numbers that your totally combat-dominated games require, you're solving your adventure design issue, but what about the type of game I'm talking about? It would be unplayable by your approach since the characters will certainly have all the skills they need, given that they got every combat benny for free. I think at least a part of the blame for this rests with the 4e designers, especially WRT the DMG. They did pay lip service to non-combat elements of the game, but they failed to emphasize that these needed to be just as critical as combat. The various module authors have followed suite and pretty much created canned adventures that always revolve around mostly only what you can do with your sword. I'm sure it requires a lot less thought and creativity to build adventures like that, and they simplify play, but that doesn't make them superior game design. Good 4e REALLY requires a LOT from DMs in terms of adventure design. Just like it requires a lot from players if they want to succeed. I think the vast majority of DMs have just been encouraged to take the easier path, and then it shows up problems. They aren't necessarily problems with the design of 4e. They can also be the result of limited adventure design channeling the party too much in one direction IMHO. I just would be disappointed if the game system itself gets munged into a shape where that is the only way you can play it, and I'm actually glad to see that the 4e core design team seems to understand that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, about defenses aka. PHB2 defenses feats
Top