Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="James McMurray" data-source="post: 4742312" data-attributes="member: 743">Nor am I. Except for a few examples, all monster attacks deal damage. I'm suggesting that damage be increased. Not just damage for attacks vs. AC. Damage for all attack. You'll note I never mentioned Armor Class in my suggestions.They're not really problems though. It's the few boredom inducing effects that are typically tied to those defenses that are problematic.I don't know where you're coming from with the AC angle. I'm not talking about AC.I bring it up because it is a side effect of the feats in question. If you only want to talk about math, fine, but don't expect to get much headway on "fixing" a rules system.All very true. But I'm not sure what this has to do with secondary defenses and broken math.That's exactly what I'm saying, and why one of my proposed fixes would be to limit the number of stunning attacks players see.I get the feeling that we agree for the most part, but that one or both of us isn't really seeing what the other is saying and thinks that we don't. At least, I can say I agree with 90% of this post.</blockquote>