Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="keterys" data-source="post: 4744019" data-attributes="member: 43019">I don't think that making basic attacks more powerful than at-wills is really a desirable design outcome.It is pretty easy for folks to basically decide for themselves: A) I'm okay with people getting the bonus to attack or B) I'm not okay with people getting the bonus to attack, and then giving the bonus for free or banning the feat.Really, I think it's more just problematic for two situations1) By RAW campaigns, like Living Forgotten Realms2) People who can't or won't do or care about the underlying mathThe first has, honestly, a host of other problems as well. The second only matters if it leads to disparities between the PCs in effectiveness or if the DM doesn't balance around the capabilities of the party. Both of those are problematic, and I suspect more likely but by no means certain in the second case.But, really, I doubt anyone is going to convince anyone else of anything on the 17th or 18th page of this thread. It's probably okay to move on, wait to see what's said or done next officially, and turn on the apathy blinders in the meantime <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>