Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, Attacks of Oppportunity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 5945988" data-attributes="member: 11300"><p>I can understand where you're coming from here but I'm not so sure I totally agree. Firstly, an opportunity attack or attack of opportunity is pretty much conceived as a single attack and not part of the back and forth of a round. It is when a combatant let's down their defenses when directly threatened by another combatant (or stops being able to counter-threaten the threatening combatant more precisely).</p><p></p><p>I think a basic given for most creatures is that if they are being threatened, they are in danger. I think a prime motivation here for the creature is not to get whacked if being threatened. Now if disengaging safely is the prime motivation, then this should be achievable unless the threatening combatant is ready to follow them. Otherwise, incautious movement in, through, away or around a threatening combatant is something that a combatant simply will not do unless pushed with a very good reason. The kobold may scamper past if it thinks it can but under normal circumstances, it is more likely going to wait for an opening to do such things. (Aside: I think a lot of DMs over-optimize their combatants actions when in battle, many creatures are perhaps better represented with less efficiency).</p><p></p><p>However, a big issue here is the turn-based cyclic initiative and the general unwillingness of a DM to separate one combatant from it's group when more believably, combatants are going to be a little more spontaneous (and even chaotic) to such combat openings. The game as presented does not easily allow this and so you need a game-mechanic to represent this "normal" behaviour. And thus, you are always going to have to deal with such meta-mechanics as turns, opportunity attacks and so on to try and represent this natural, believable behaviour. It is inescapable. So when a kobold backs away from a threatening character, it is up to the DM to decide which meta-mechanic to use to best represent the natural behaviour (did they withdraw, shift, or did they recklessly move). And so while the kobold does not know such things, the DM (and players) are left with the meta-mechanics to best represent and roleplay their combatants and characters.</p><p></p><p>Best Regards</p><p>Herremann the Wise</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 5945988, member: 11300"] I can understand where you're coming from here but I'm not so sure I totally agree. Firstly, an opportunity attack or attack of opportunity is pretty much conceived as a single attack and not part of the back and forth of a round. It is when a combatant let's down their defenses when directly threatened by another combatant (or stops being able to counter-threaten the threatening combatant more precisely). I think a basic given for most creatures is that if they are being threatened, they are in danger. I think a prime motivation here for the creature is not to get whacked if being threatened. Now if disengaging safely is the prime motivation, then this should be achievable unless the threatening combatant is ready to follow them. Otherwise, incautious movement in, through, away or around a threatening combatant is something that a combatant simply will not do unless pushed with a very good reason. The kobold may scamper past if it thinks it can but under normal circumstances, it is more likely going to wait for an opening to do such things. (Aside: I think a lot of DMs over-optimize their combatants actions when in battle, many creatures are perhaps better represented with less efficiency). However, a big issue here is the turn-based cyclic initiative and the general unwillingness of a DM to separate one combatant from it's group when more believably, combatants are going to be a little more spontaneous (and even chaotic) to such combat openings. The game as presented does not easily allow this and so you need a game-mechanic to represent this "normal" behaviour. And thus, you are always going to have to deal with such meta-mechanics as turns, opportunity attacks and so on to try and represent this natural, believable behaviour. It is inescapable. So when a kobold backs away from a threatening character, it is up to the DM to decide which meta-mechanic to use to best represent the natural behaviour (did they withdraw, shift, or did they recklessly move). And so while the kobold does not know such things, the DM (and players) are left with the meta-mechanics to best represent and roleplay their combatants and characters. Best Regards Herremann the Wise [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, Attacks of Oppportunity?
Top