Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So Class Complexity...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9408900" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>I've ruminated on this off and on today. </p><p></p><p>I think it comes down to a mixture of build, choice points, and rules knowledge. </p><p></p><p>A low complexity character doesn't really need much info beyond the basics. They don't cast magic, their abilities are active or reactive. Action surge is a use ability (you use it and then it's done). Everything else is basic rules 101 (attack, skills, etc). You can make a fighter or a rogue and have everything explained on their character sheet. </p><p></p><p>Barbarians require a little more tracking. Rage changes your combat stats and must be tracked to make sure it doesn't end. Further, rage fuels a lot of their secondary abilities now so a player needs to track rage far more than a fighter tracks action surge or second wind. I think they are low end average, but definitely more than a fighter.</p><p></p><p>Casters automatically bring in more complexity. The paladin and ranger add a little magic to the warrior chassis and the cleric and wizard are mostly spells with nothing else to track. Playing them well requires a lot of skill, but playing a blaster, healer, or smite/HM spammer is still effective.</p><p></p><p>Druid, bard and sorcerer are caster+. They not only are full casters, but have additional resources to track (wild shape, sorcery points and bardic inspiration) plus they have complex elements to their builds and interactions. While cleric and wizard both have abilities outside of spells, they are secondary to their magic. Wild shape, metamagic and bard dice are integral to their identity.</p><p></p><p>Warlocks have two things a new player needs to know: their magic doesn't work like ANY other caster in the game and it interacts with invocations in different ways. While it is possible to play a warlock as an eb spammer, you still have to be aware of the right abilities (agonizing blast) to take. Lastly, monks have a variety of things they can do, some cost focus and others don't, and they are always weighing various options. </p><p></p><p>Maybe a better way to think of it is: how much homework does a player need to do to understand what their character does. Low characters don't require much more than simple system understanding and their class features. Average has more complex features or spells, and high has very complicated features, spells or both. If you handed a player a pregen and the PHB, how easy it would be for the player to figure out how to play that pregen is what we're looking at.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 9408900, member: 7635"] I've ruminated on this off and on today. I think it comes down to a mixture of build, choice points, and rules knowledge. A low complexity character doesn't really need much info beyond the basics. They don't cast magic, their abilities are active or reactive. Action surge is a use ability (you use it and then it's done). Everything else is basic rules 101 (attack, skills, etc). You can make a fighter or a rogue and have everything explained on their character sheet. Barbarians require a little more tracking. Rage changes your combat stats and must be tracked to make sure it doesn't end. Further, rage fuels a lot of their secondary abilities now so a player needs to track rage far more than a fighter tracks action surge or second wind. I think they are low end average, but definitely more than a fighter. Casters automatically bring in more complexity. The paladin and ranger add a little magic to the warrior chassis and the cleric and wizard are mostly spells with nothing else to track. Playing them well requires a lot of skill, but playing a blaster, healer, or smite/HM spammer is still effective. Druid, bard and sorcerer are caster+. They not only are full casters, but have additional resources to track (wild shape, sorcery points and bardic inspiration) plus they have complex elements to their builds and interactions. While cleric and wizard both have abilities outside of spells, they are secondary to their magic. Wild shape, metamagic and bard dice are integral to their identity. Warlocks have two things a new player needs to know: their magic doesn't work like ANY other caster in the game and it interacts with invocations in different ways. While it is possible to play a warlock as an eb spammer, you still have to be aware of the right abilities (agonizing blast) to take. Lastly, monks have a variety of things they can do, some cost focus and others don't, and they are always weighing various options. Maybe a better way to think of it is: how much homework does a player need to do to understand what their character does. Low characters don't require much more than simple system understanding and their class features. Average has more complex features or spells, and high has very complicated features, spells or both. If you handed a player a pregen and the PHB, how easy it would be for the player to figure out how to play that pregen is what we're looking at. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So Class Complexity...
Top