Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5305249" data-attributes="member: 78116">I don't really mind the Thri-Kreen myself, but I can't understand the Mekillot. It looks obscenely silly and cute in the 2E art as it does in the 4E art. Nothing makes that creature look intimidating and not completely silly without utterly redesigning it.Edit: Original Mekillot<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v305/Aegeri/mekillot.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /> I am aware there is another one that looks more reptillian than that, but you can't blame 4E for making the Mekillot silly. The original did that first. They probably should have gone with the revised art for the Mekillot, but they didn't and that's the breaks I'm afraid. It does get my "award" for one of the most daft looking monsters in 4E. This does make this statement:Rather ironic, considering researching what it originally looked like it why it looks so obscenely daft now.</blockquote>