Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So...did Dragon wow you?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesM" data-source="post: 3818576" data-attributes="member: 2762"><p>While I agree wholeheartedly with those who argue that it's a bit unfair to judge the online <em>Dragon</em> based solely on an incomplete first issue, not to mention those who rightly remember that the early days of Paizo's stewardship of the magazines weren't all wine and roses, the fact remains that, after the very public killing of the print editions and the repeated promises to "wow" us with all the cool things they could now do virtually that would have been "inefficient" to do on paper, e-<em>Dragon</em>'s first issue should have been <strong>amazing</strong>. This is the launch of a wholly new approach to a venerable gaming institution. This is the beginning of a bold, new era, one that many people greet with justifiable skepticism. WotC should have devoted significant resources to making this first issue rock so hard that we nearly forgot the existence of any other <em>Dragon</em>. What we got instead was an incomplete, seemingly half-hearted attempt to dress up web enhancements as premium content.</p><p></p><p>Is it fair to hold WotC up to such a high standard? Probably not. But then WotC has no one to blame but themselves. Since it was announced a year ago that Paizo had lost the license to produce print versions of the magazines, we've gotten nothing but overblown hype and extravagant promises about how great the online versions would be. I fully understand why they did this, but, having done so, they should have made a greater effort at trying to come through on their promises. As it is now, e-<em>Dragon</em> looks like an afterthought rather than something that WotC considers important enough not merely to get right but <em>get perfect</em> out of the gates.</p><p></p><p>Sure, it's deeply unfair to expect a rookie to hit a grand slam in his first at bat, but, after being told for months that he was the second coming of Babe Ruth, should we have expected any less?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesM, post: 3818576, member: 2762"] While I agree wholeheartedly with those who argue that it's a bit unfair to judge the online [i]Dragon[/i] based solely on an incomplete first issue, not to mention those who rightly remember that the early days of Paizo's stewardship of the magazines weren't all wine and roses, the fact remains that, after the very public killing of the print editions and the repeated promises to "wow" us with all the cool things they could now do virtually that would have been "inefficient" to do on paper, e-[i]Dragon[/i]'s first issue should have been [b]amazing[/b]. This is the launch of a wholly new approach to a venerable gaming institution. This is the beginning of a bold, new era, one that many people greet with justifiable skepticism. WotC should have devoted significant resources to making this first issue rock so hard that we nearly forgot the existence of any other [i]Dragon[/i]. What we got instead was an incomplete, seemingly half-hearted attempt to dress up web enhancements as premium content. Is it fair to hold WotC up to such a high standard? Probably not. But then WotC has no one to blame but themselves. Since it was announced a year ago that Paizo had lost the license to produce print versions of the magazines, we've gotten nothing but overblown hype and extravagant promises about how great the online versions would be. I fully understand why they did this, but, having done so, they should have made a greater effort at trying to come through on their promises. As it is now, e-[i]Dragon[/i] looks like an afterthought rather than something that WotC considers important enough not merely to get right but [i]get perfect[/i] out of the gates. Sure, it's deeply unfair to expect a rookie to hit a grand slam in his first at bat, but, after being told for months that he was the second coming of Babe Ruth, should we have expected any less? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So...did Dragon wow you?
Top