Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6690166" data-attributes="member: 177">Given that even telling us that was kind of stretching propriety, don't expect much other direct comment from WotC on it.And, I don't think *they* ever said that the person in question was holding up an "OGL regarding 5e".  I think they said conversion documents were delayed because of this (and, by extension, I'd expect a lot of things may have been delayed), but not an OGL.We ought to stop referring to "an OGL for 5e" anyway.  The OGL is something very specific, with specific features, many of which may not be in whatever licenses they have for 5e. We should talk about a license for 5e, not an OGL for 5e, otherwise we are setting ourselves up for disappointment when, through our own unfounded assumptions, we feel they reneged on promises that *they* were never a party to.</blockquote>