Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So.... Fighter's boundless Endurance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NMcCoy" data-source="post: 4280752" data-attributes="member: 61546"><p>In that case I need to clarify something else - is a square adjacent to itself? The rules aren't clear on this point, but common sense says it must be, because otherwise you can protect yourself from a flaming sphere by moving into its square.</p><p></p><p>I'd imagined the Flaming Sphere to resemble its 3.5 counterpart, a solid ("spongy") 5-foot-diameter ball that took up space and nobody in their right mind would try to walk through. It seems the 4e version is a wispier thing that only hurts you if either you stick around too long next to it or it reaches out and whacks you. Though rereading the 3.5 version, it may not be as different as I imagined: The sphere does its thing upon entering the target's square (which indeed implies that for a subsequent attack it'd need to roll off of them and back on); setting aside the obviously different economy of actions, the main difference seems to be we've gained a pseudo-aura (a d4 so it counts as a "damage roll" for the purposes of Astral Fire, I suppose, if that counts as "using" a power*) and lost the ability to bounce.</p><p></p><p>After searching, it seems there are some cleric powers that do explicitly "occupy" spaces (and <em>one</em> wizard power, Bigby's Grasping Hands). But if "occupy" is meant to be a keyword, they're being pretty sloppy with it (see Blade Barrier, which is a conjuration that talks about "the spaces occupied by the blade barrier" even though it clearly doesn't Occupy spaces.) At the very least the wording of p59 should be much more clear about what "occupying" means. My first instinct would certainly have been "enemies can't go through the Flaming Sphere - it's Medium and a conjuration (and the rules basically say that conjurations block spaces like party members do). If you can't walk through the halfling, you can't walk through a 5-foot flaming sponge." Even so, what with this being Exception-Based Design, why not say that conjurations don't block movement, and then specify an exception in the half-dozen or so that do? It would seem to make a lot more sense, and would spare the poor wizard thinking his Flaming Sphere blocks movement until he reaches 15th level and sees a power that explicitly Occupies a space.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">*for all the keyword-oriented design in 4e (which I heartily approve, by the way) they sure seem to have missed the boat in some places. "Occupying" a space, "using" a power, Flaming Sphere hurting people that start their turns "next to" rather than adjacent...</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NMcCoy, post: 4280752, member: 61546"] In that case I need to clarify something else - is a square adjacent to itself? The rules aren't clear on this point, but common sense says it must be, because otherwise you can protect yourself from a flaming sphere by moving into its square. I'd imagined the Flaming Sphere to resemble its 3.5 counterpart, a solid ("spongy") 5-foot-diameter ball that took up space and nobody in their right mind would try to walk through. It seems the 4e version is a wispier thing that only hurts you if either you stick around too long next to it or it reaches out and whacks you. Though rereading the 3.5 version, it may not be as different as I imagined: The sphere does its thing upon entering the target's square (which indeed implies that for a subsequent attack it'd need to roll off of them and back on); setting aside the obviously different economy of actions, the main difference seems to be we've gained a pseudo-aura (a d4 so it counts as a "damage roll" for the purposes of Astral Fire, I suppose, if that counts as "using" a power*) and lost the ability to bounce. After searching, it seems there are some cleric powers that do explicitly "occupy" spaces (and [i]one[/i] wizard power, Bigby's Grasping Hands). But if "occupy" is meant to be a keyword, they're being pretty sloppy with it (see Blade Barrier, which is a conjuration that talks about "the spaces occupied by the blade barrier" even though it clearly doesn't Occupy spaces.) At the very least the wording of p59 should be much more clear about what "occupying" means. My first instinct would certainly have been "enemies can't go through the Flaming Sphere - it's Medium and a conjuration (and the rules basically say that conjurations block spaces like party members do). If you can't walk through the halfling, you can't walk through a 5-foot flaming sponge." Even so, what with this being Exception-Based Design, why not say that conjurations don't block movement, and then specify an exception in the half-dozen or so that do? It would seem to make a lot more sense, and would spare the poor wizard thinking his Flaming Sphere blocks movement until he reaches 15th level and sees a power that explicitly Occupies a space. [SIZE=2]*for all the keyword-oriented design in 4e (which I heartily approve, by the way) they sure seem to have missed the boat in some places. "Occupying" a space, "using" a power, Flaming Sphere hurting people that start their turns "next to" rather than adjacent...[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So.... Fighter's boundless Endurance
Top