Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Marius Delphus" data-source="post: 4628947" data-attributes="member: 447">Neither do I question that they have the right. But WOTC's ability to unilaterally revoke the D20 STL absent cause has been questioned by at least three different posters in this thread. So the claim was made that they cannot.Has anyone bought a Necromancer product in 2009 who can verify that the d20 logo is still in place? Assuming it is there, I agree that Necromancer's retention of the d20 logo on merchandise for sale online after December 31, 2008 is also telling in the matter of whether the D20 STL has been effectively revoked. I'd be very interested to see Clark Peterson's reasoning as I have seen Vic Wertz's.So why the acid tone?  I don't mean to seem antagonistic or anything, so I'm sorry if I do. And I don't have an agenda here; like I said before, I'm just seeking a story that hangs together properly. If the story turns out to be "no, WOTC hasn't actually revoked the darn thing at all," that's actually fine by me. It means less work for me scrubbing the logo from the ENP books I've done, after all.In fact, I think it'd be great if we can all agree that the whole thing boils down to precisely this:WOTC hasn't affirmatively stated, in any medium, that the D20 STL has in fact been revoked; therefore (and for that reason alone), it hasn't been.Despite any indications I might have given to the contrary, I could get on board with that.</blockquote>