Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Orcus" data-source="post: 4634295" data-attributes="member: 1254">I agree with this 100%. I certainly treated Scott's announcement as termination. I appreciated the sell-off period, because that was not required. I considered that a nice gesture. If we continue to sell hard stock, we will sticker over the logo. We have asked OBS to remove the d20 logo from our pdfs and that process is underway. It may take some time. As Ken said, it is perhaps an interesting academic exercise to debate whether they actually terminated the license. But that was their clear desire. And people who want to piss and moan and split hairs about that are not helping the situation of getting a revised GSL. Come on, people, this is D&D. This is gaming. This is the OGL and d20STL. If Scott says its terminated, and we all know it, then its terminated. Dont lawyer this all up. And I say that as a lawyer. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />If someone wants to take the position that the current d20STL only involves termination for breach and so WotC woudl have to issue a new version with a termination at will clause and then publish a termination, I guess that is there choice to take that position. I mean, at this point what benefit does anyone get from the d20 license? But like Ken said, I cant imagine Wizards is that concerned (though I dont want to speak for them). I think they accomplished their goal. And I, for one, intend to voluntarily comply no matter what.</blockquote>

Verification