Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So.... hide?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cthulhu42" data-source="post: 6592911" data-attributes="member: 6792361"><p>So it appears that there is no real agreed upon answer for this. Despite some opinions to the contrary, it looks as though even some of the designers are using house rules to temper the halfling hide trick. I've read this thread until my head hurts, as well as a couple of other threads on different forums, and it just doesn't look like there's a clear consensus. </p><p></p><p>I really don't want to nerf my player; the hide trick is probably one of the reasons he wanted to play the character in the first place. But I do think we're veering towards eye rolling cheese, so I want to find a middle ground that we can both agree on. </p><p></p><p>So here's what I propose: First off, I'm thinking more and more that some of the ability to find someone who is hiding from you stems from intelligence. You could potentially pull off the jack-in-the-box trick against an animal, but it'd be a lot harder against a human. I know that wisdom is already the real factor, given the perception check vs the hiders stealth, but my idea would bring intelligence into it as well. </p><p></p><p>So... if the halfling is trying to hide from a beast with animal intelligence or below, he gets to hide wherever he wants, and he can do it again and again. If he wants to hide behind the wizard and pop off sneak attacks and the re-hide behind the same wizard, then have at it. </p><p></p><p>However, if the opponent has higher than animal intelligence AND is not distracted, the halfling can only hide behind the wizard once and get a normal hide check. If he pops out for an SA and attempts to hide behind the same bit of cover for a second time from a foe that is not engaged in melee or otherwise distracted, he does so at disadvantage (or maybe the foe gets advantage on his perception check. Whatever). If the halfling attempts his 2nd hide behind a DIFFERENT bit of cover, then he gets a normal check again. And also, if the foe is in melee, the halfling can hide behind the same wizard with a normal check. </p><p></p><p>This feels, to me, like a pretty fair compromise. I foresee very few circumstances where he won't be able to hide wherever he wants at a normal check, but there will be those few instances where he'll have to suck it up and deal with disadvantage. I feel like his worst case scenario will be to have to mix up his hiding spots from time to time. </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cthulhu42, post: 6592911, member: 6792361"] So it appears that there is no real agreed upon answer for this. Despite some opinions to the contrary, it looks as though even some of the designers are using house rules to temper the halfling hide trick. I've read this thread until my head hurts, as well as a couple of other threads on different forums, and it just doesn't look like there's a clear consensus. I really don't want to nerf my player; the hide trick is probably one of the reasons he wanted to play the character in the first place. But I do think we're veering towards eye rolling cheese, so I want to find a middle ground that we can both agree on. So here's what I propose: First off, I'm thinking more and more that some of the ability to find someone who is hiding from you stems from intelligence. You could potentially pull off the jack-in-the-box trick against an animal, but it'd be a lot harder against a human. I know that wisdom is already the real factor, given the perception check vs the hiders stealth, but my idea would bring intelligence into it as well. So... if the halfling is trying to hide from a beast with animal intelligence or below, he gets to hide wherever he wants, and he can do it again and again. If he wants to hide behind the wizard and pop off sneak attacks and the re-hide behind the same wizard, then have at it. However, if the opponent has higher than animal intelligence AND is not distracted, the halfling can only hide behind the wizard once and get a normal hide check. If he pops out for an SA and attempts to hide behind the same bit of cover for a second time from a foe that is not engaged in melee or otherwise distracted, he does so at disadvantage (or maybe the foe gets advantage on his perception check. Whatever). If the halfling attempts his 2nd hide behind a DIFFERENT bit of cover, then he gets a normal check again. And also, if the foe is in melee, the halfling can hide behind the same wizard with a normal check. This feels, to me, like a pretty fair compromise. I foresee very few circumstances where he won't be able to hide wherever he wants at a normal check, but there will be those few instances where he'll have to suck it up and deal with disadvantage. I feel like his worst case scenario will be to have to mix up his hiding spots from time to time. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So.... hide?
Top