Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CreamCloud0" data-source="post: 8921195" data-attributes="member: 7034710">I don’t really see how it’s all that complicated, stark while chaotic on the individual level recognised the need for greater law in the execution of good, it is comparable to a chaotic character aligning themselves with the side of cosmic law over the battle for cosmic good.I think the cap comes off as more lawful than he actually is because he’s so good, it is the good thing to do to obey the law and be a well behaved citizen but as I said earlier when push comes to shove cap prioritises being good over being lawful.Just because you are one alignment does not mean you cannot recognise the benefits of other, even opposing alignments.Also I think it’s good that 5e got rid of the lawful requirement for paladins, while dedicating yourself to certain concepts is vaguely lawful in theory there’s basically nothing saying how you have to go around supporting those values.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CreamCloud0, post: 8921195, member: 7034710"] I don’t really see how it’s all that complicated, stark while chaotic on the individual level recognised the need for greater law in the execution of good, it is comparable to a chaotic character aligning themselves with the side of cosmic law over the battle for cosmic good. I think the cap comes off as more lawful than he actually is because he’s so good, it is the good thing to do to obey the law and be a well behaved citizen but as I said earlier when push comes to shove cap prioritises being good over being lawful. Just because you are one alignment does not mean you cannot recognise the benefits of other, even opposing alignments. Also I think it’s good that 5e got rid of the lawful requirement for paladins, while dedicating yourself to certain concepts is vaguely lawful in theory there’s basically nothing saying how you have to go around supporting those values. [/QUOTE]

Verification