Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, how many are avoiding Essentials?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5384586" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>I think, as NeonChameleon said that the major difference is EXISTING 4e characters are never invalidated by Essentials. In a VERY small number of cases like Melee Training a rules update that coincided with Essentials being released will have an impact on a character sheet, but no player choice once made has ever been invalidated. None of them has really been substantially changed. Worst case a player MAY want to retrain like with the new and improved Expertise and defense feats, but they don't have to and they won't be missing much if they don't bother. I know for instance none of my players has even noticed the existence of better feats in Essentials. They pretty much purely go by CB anyway and rarely care about updates, so they'll probably play happily to the end of the campaign before they make new characters and start using those new feats.</p><p></p><p>3.0 -> 3.5 -> PF OTOH all require major rewriting. Some things have been removed in both transitions and other things that have a major impact on the character changed. That isn't even to mention any new stuff that was added. Sure, there is a degree of compatibility in both of those transitions, the core structure of the rules is very similar, but they are each different games. Of course PF never claimed to be 3.5, so that's fine, you start playing it you will expect to redo anything and everything potentially. I'm sure the changes to some characters are very small, maybe no more profound than changes you might want to make to a 4e character with the latest updates, but they can also be MUCH larger. You can sorta kinda continue to use 3.5 stuff that doesn't exist in PF, if you squint a little now and then as well, but by the same token you can ignore rules updates in 4e.</p><p></p><p>Still seems to me that 4e is a lot smaller scale of changes with a lot more compatibility than either of the 3.x series transitions. I can see why some players in some games might not see them as vastly different kinds of things, but others will. I mean taking a high level fighter from 3.5 to PF is basically a total major rewrite of the character for instance. But if you were playing a lower level wizard you might notice only a few changes in spell text that don't matter to you too much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5384586, member: 82106"] I think, as NeonChameleon said that the major difference is EXISTING 4e characters are never invalidated by Essentials. In a VERY small number of cases like Melee Training a rules update that coincided with Essentials being released will have an impact on a character sheet, but no player choice once made has ever been invalidated. None of them has really been substantially changed. Worst case a player MAY want to retrain like with the new and improved Expertise and defense feats, but they don't have to and they won't be missing much if they don't bother. I know for instance none of my players has even noticed the existence of better feats in Essentials. They pretty much purely go by CB anyway and rarely care about updates, so they'll probably play happily to the end of the campaign before they make new characters and start using those new feats. 3.0 -> 3.5 -> PF OTOH all require major rewriting. Some things have been removed in both transitions and other things that have a major impact on the character changed. That isn't even to mention any new stuff that was added. Sure, there is a degree of compatibility in both of those transitions, the core structure of the rules is very similar, but they are each different games. Of course PF never claimed to be 3.5, so that's fine, you start playing it you will expect to redo anything and everything potentially. I'm sure the changes to some characters are very small, maybe no more profound than changes you might want to make to a 4e character with the latest updates, but they can also be MUCH larger. You can sorta kinda continue to use 3.5 stuff that doesn't exist in PF, if you squint a little now and then as well, but by the same token you can ignore rules updates in 4e. Still seems to me that 4e is a lot smaller scale of changes with a lot more compatibility than either of the 3.x series transitions. I can see why some players in some games might not see them as vastly different kinds of things, but others will. I mean taking a high level fighter from 3.5 to PF is basically a total major rewrite of the character for instance. But if you were playing a lower level wizard you might notice only a few changes in spell text that don't matter to you too much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, how many are avoiding Essentials?
Top