Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jmartkdr2" data-source="post: 9346220" data-attributes="member: 7017304">I don't recall using it ever in the few 1e games I played in - but I can't say if it was because we didn't use those rules or it just never came up.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In the other older ones, including OD&D, 2e, 3/3.5e did you use them?</li> </ul>Sometimes, but only rarely. I would like to have played a psionic warrior and/or psion but most dms I played with were against psionics generally. <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Did you like having them front and center in 4e?</li> </ul>Yes, and I loved them being connected to monks.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Does 5e have enough, too much, or not even close?</li> </ul>Way less than I'd like - I could live with it being an extension of a general maneuvers system, but I think a full class is more likely to actually scratch the itch.  <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If you didn't use them in 1e, what did you do if a monster was listed as having them?</li> </ul>Do not recall.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Do you think there should be able to be multi-part polls that limit you to one answer in each part?</li> </ul>I guess that would be nice but only if it's not too much work for the site managers.</blockquote>