Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Denaes" data-source="post: 2731408" data-attributes="member: 33738">Looking at the Gravetouched Ghoul, it mentions their claw/claw/bite under a header "Full Attack". There is also text mentioning that if they have a weapon, they choose the claw/claw/bite or weapon. That leads me to believe that it's a full attack option, which normally don't just add onto other attacks, like flurry of blows. That really makes the Gravetouched a bit less useful in combo with a monk. Now victims hit by the Claw or Bite attacks inflict Paralysis. A Monk can attack with any body part, which I'd assume would include claws/nails (if the race has them) and bites. Is there a ruling that would prevent Paralysis & Ghoul Fevor from working with Flurry of Blows if the attack is described as being from the claws/bite?Being a Ghoul, I'm pretty sure being Lawful is right out. Under the undead class of ghoul it mentions that Ghouls are CE and how to 'relax' that for PCs. Lawful is described as exceedingly rare and while I don't want to be evil, I'm going to be a flesh eater and very conflicted so I don't want to be lawful. Aside from taking up Fighter with a focus on unarmed combat afterwards, is there another class (or PrC) that deals with unarmed combat that wouldn't conflict with many levels of Monk? Or even a variant Monk class for the "non-lawful". I'm limited to D&D books, not other d20 stuff. I snaked the Complete Warrior from a friend the other day and it seems to be the wrong book somehow. They have that Tattooed Monk and a Drunken Style Fighter, but nothing else (at a glance) I could say involved unarmed combat. Would the Monk options be the Divine or Adventurer book instead?</blockquote>

Verification