Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, in 3.5e rule, once a cohort lost a level, never catches up?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shin Okada" data-source="post: 4130531" data-attributes="member: 1956"><p>In my understanding (or at least in my way of using that word in the first post), a PC "went behind in level" means "A PC went behind in levels relative to other PCs by any reason". Losing a level due to energy drain or death maybe one reason. Spending too much XP may another reason (that PC may not level-up at the same time as the other characters). Simply starting as a lower level character (some DMs like this style) can be another reason, too.</p><p></p><p>But anyway, </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I tend to disagree with this. Of course, the leader of the cohort is most responsible to the condition of his cohort. But cohort is indeed a member of adventuring party and in my opinion, in an adventuring party, in most cases, someone's death is not that one's fault or not the particular PC's fault. That is the fault of entire adventuring party.</p><p></p><p>I think, that is also one of the reason why PC XP award rule changed in 3.5e from 3.0e's. Someone died should not be penalized much.</p><p></p><p>By the way,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is wrong by the RAW. </p><p></p><p>From DMG P.105</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The cohort does not leave. Just his advancement is stalled. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. That is what I wrote in the first post. When a PC went some levels behind other PCs, that PC gains more XP from the same encounter comparing to other PCs and thus catches up with them eventually. But once a cohort loses some levels, he/she never catches up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shin Okada, post: 4130531, member: 1956"] In my understanding (or at least in my way of using that word in the first post), a PC "went behind in level" means "A PC went behind in levels relative to other PCs by any reason". Losing a level due to energy drain or death maybe one reason. Spending too much XP may another reason (that PC may not level-up at the same time as the other characters). Simply starting as a lower level character (some DMs like this style) can be another reason, too. But anyway, I tend to disagree with this. Of course, the leader of the cohort is most responsible to the condition of his cohort. But cohort is indeed a member of adventuring party and in my opinion, in an adventuring party, in most cases, someone's death is not that one's fault or not the particular PC's fault. That is the fault of entire adventuring party. I think, that is also one of the reason why PC XP award rule changed in 3.5e from 3.0e's. Someone died should not be penalized much. By the way, This is wrong by the RAW. From DMG P.105 The cohort does not leave. Just his advancement is stalled. Yes. That is what I wrote in the first post. When a PC went some levels behind other PCs, that PC gains more XP from the same encounter comparing to other PCs and thus catches up with them eventually. But once a cohort loses some levels, he/she never catches up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So, in 3.5e rule, once a cohort lost a level, never catches up?
Top