Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So its all about combat again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 5936826" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>The only way it's like hit points is if you institute a rule that every time you miss with an attack, you hit an ally. If you add another warm body to your team in combat, your team is more powerful, period. You have the <em>option</em> to spend resources keeping that warm body alive, but you don't <em>have</em> to; PCs in desperate straits can let their teammates drop and focus on victory. If you add a warm body to your team in a skill challenge, you may well be worse off for it.</p><p></p><p>But regardless, I have never seen a skill challenge that was either fun or believable without a hefty dose of DM fiat to make it work. Here's what I've seen happen any time the DM runs a straight-up skill challenge:</p><p></p><p>#1. Each player plays "Mother-May-I" with the DM to find the highest skill modifier the DM will let her use.</p><p>#2. Players go around the table, try to find different ways of phrasing whatever rationales they deployed in step #1, and roll d20s in turn until the DM announces success or failure. The DM gives a contorted, unconvincing narrative whose obvious goal is to string the players along until they reach the prescribed number of successes. Now and then, the DM may decide that some player's excuse for using Skill X has expired and send her back to step #1.</p><p></p><p>What we have here is a mechanical system which is both rigid and mindless. There are no decisions to make, and no way to think "outside the box" and get an advantage. Mechanically, all you do is sit there and roll your best applicable skill until the challenge is over. The DM's task is to cloak this tedious reality from the players with narrative flash and dazzle. But D&D players are pretty smart, and in many cases they've been on the other side of the DM screen. It's not hard for them to figure out what the DM is doing.</p><p></p><p>The only way to make it fun is to either a) make the system less rigid (if you come up with a clever idea, you can get an auto-success or even multiple successes), or b) make it less mindless (different skill choices have different effects and the mechanics of the situation change as the challenge proceeds). The sample challenges in the DMG take the latter route, which says something about what the designers thought of their own system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 5936826, member: 58197"] The only way it's like hit points is if you institute a rule that every time you miss with an attack, you hit an ally. If you add another warm body to your team in combat, your team is more powerful, period. You have the [I]option[/I] to spend resources keeping that warm body alive, but you don't [I]have[/I] to; PCs in desperate straits can let their teammates drop and focus on victory. If you add a warm body to your team in a skill challenge, you may well be worse off for it. But regardless, I have never seen a skill challenge that was either fun or believable without a hefty dose of DM fiat to make it work. Here's what I've seen happen any time the DM runs a straight-up skill challenge: #1. Each player plays "Mother-May-I" with the DM to find the highest skill modifier the DM will let her use. #2. Players go around the table, try to find different ways of phrasing whatever rationales they deployed in step #1, and roll d20s in turn until the DM announces success or failure. The DM gives a contorted, unconvincing narrative whose obvious goal is to string the players along until they reach the prescribed number of successes. Now and then, the DM may decide that some player's excuse for using Skill X has expired and send her back to step #1. What we have here is a mechanical system which is both rigid and mindless. There are no decisions to make, and no way to think "outside the box" and get an advantage. Mechanically, all you do is sit there and roll your best applicable skill until the challenge is over. The DM's task is to cloak this tedious reality from the players with narrative flash and dazzle. But D&D players are pretty smart, and in many cases they've been on the other side of the DM screen. It's not hard for them to figure out what the DM is doing. The only way to make it fun is to either a) make the system less rigid (if you come up with a clever idea, you can get an auto-success or even multiple successes), or b) make it less mindless (different skill choices have different effects and the mechanics of the situation change as the challenge proceeds). The sample challenges in the DMG take the latter route, which says something about what the designers thought of their own system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So its all about combat again?
Top