Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
So, Wandavision?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8219291" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>So, this is a line of thinking I know they won't be using, but it might be entertaining.</p><p></p><p>The Jarvis AI (which is Stark technology), and the Mind Stone are used to produce the Ultron AI, by Stark and Banner. Stark's legal claim on the Mind Stone is... highly questionable. It is a natural resource, but recovered from Loki when he used it as a weapon. Loki and the Mind Stone were in custody of SHIELD - a government agency. But that was custody as evidence, and does not indicate ownership. Let us leave ownership of the Mind Stone and its internal logic out of the discussion for the moment...</p><p></p><p>And now we hit an interesting hitch. Was Ultron a person? If not, then Stark Industries is on the hook for all the damage Ultron does, as their technology run amok. That includes illegal acquisition of Vibranium, the death toll and property damage in Sokovia, goodness knows how many acts of cybercrime, etc. Stark Industries was big and wealthy, but not that wealthy. This should have destroyed Stark.</p><p></p><p>But, it didn't. So either Ultron's origins were hidden from the world, and the whole thing covered up, or a legal out was found. Calling Ultron a person makes his actions purely his (I think they use the masculine pronoun in the movie) own, and gets stark largely off the hook.</p><p></p><p>If Ultron was a person, then Vision, as Ultron's progeny, was also a person. Then Heyward was defiling a corpse, which is generally illegal.</p><p></p><p>If Ultron's origins were hidden from the world (which may not have been all that difficult, as so few people actually <em>knew</em> those origins), then it is very difficult for Stark to make a claim to legal ownership of Vision.</p><p></p><p>Vision's body was created from stolen Vibranium, the U-GIN regeneration chamber, and arguably Thor, who all then have potential claims on Vision's body. The head of U-GIN died,however, so it may be they do not know what happened. When all was said and done, Thor was probably not in any state of mind to exert his claim (which is kinda weak, but... he is a god, who would be able to stop him). Wakanda, for whatever reason, did not take custody (possibly, nobody there actually <em>thought</em> about it). </p><p></p><p>But, lastly, Vision worked with the Avengers, which was a government funded project. I suspect that once he is dead and unable to argue otherwise, it is easy to make the legal argument that Vision was an Avenger's Project asset, which was then transferred to SWORD. This would mean that Heyward's work with the body wasn't exactly illegal (on basis of ownership) though it may have been unseemly or unsanctioned.</p><p></p><p>Heyward's arrest, then, is probably more about his tactics - his evidence tampering, questionably holding a federal officer and civilian (Woo and Darcy), use of force within a civilian population, and so on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 8219291, member: 177"] So, this is a line of thinking I know they won't be using, but it might be entertaining. The Jarvis AI (which is Stark technology), and the Mind Stone are used to produce the Ultron AI, by Stark and Banner. Stark's legal claim on the Mind Stone is... highly questionable. It is a natural resource, but recovered from Loki when he used it as a weapon. Loki and the Mind Stone were in custody of SHIELD - a government agency. But that was custody as evidence, and does not indicate ownership. Let us leave ownership of the Mind Stone and its internal logic out of the discussion for the moment... And now we hit an interesting hitch. Was Ultron a person? If not, then Stark Industries is on the hook for all the damage Ultron does, as their technology run amok. That includes illegal acquisition of Vibranium, the death toll and property damage in Sokovia, goodness knows how many acts of cybercrime, etc. Stark Industries was big and wealthy, but not that wealthy. This should have destroyed Stark. But, it didn't. So either Ultron's origins were hidden from the world, and the whole thing covered up, or a legal out was found. Calling Ultron a person makes his actions purely his (I think they use the masculine pronoun in the movie) own, and gets stark largely off the hook. If Ultron was a person, then Vision, as Ultron's progeny, was also a person. Then Heyward was defiling a corpse, which is generally illegal. If Ultron's origins were hidden from the world (which may not have been all that difficult, as so few people actually [I]knew[/I] those origins), then it is very difficult for Stark to make a claim to legal ownership of Vision. Vision's body was created from stolen Vibranium, the U-GIN regeneration chamber, and arguably Thor, who all then have potential claims on Vision's body. The head of U-GIN died,however, so it may be they do not know what happened. When all was said and done, Thor was probably not in any state of mind to exert his claim (which is kinda weak, but... he is a god, who would be able to stop him). Wakanda, for whatever reason, did not take custody (possibly, nobody there actually [I]thought[/I] about it). But, lastly, Vision worked with the Avengers, which was a government funded project. I suspect that once he is dead and unable to argue otherwise, it is easy to make the legal argument that Vision was an Avenger's Project asset, which was then transferred to SWORD. This would mean that Heyward's work with the body wasn't exactly illegal (on basis of ownership) though it may have been unseemly or unsanctioned. Heyward's arrest, then, is probably more about his tactics - his evidence tampering, questionably holding a federal officer and civilian (Woo and Darcy), use of force within a civilian population, and so on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
So, Wandavision?
Top