Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="WillPhillips" data-source="post: 8904289" data-attributes="member: 85447">I think those are two different objectives (and both of them pretty fair and accurate).1. There's a mountain of some good, some bad, lots of meh content out there for 5E, and lots and lots of designers riding the coat tails of 5E's popularity to make a couple bucks. I cannot begrudge WotC for expecting a slice of that pie and wanting to QC some of it. But of course that's going to go over like a lead balloon.2. Cynthia Williams has already admitted that D&D is "really under monetised" and that she / Hasbro wants to push for "recurrent spending." This is the part I really hate: that Hasbro is primed to force WotC's D&D team to nickle and dime everything via D&D Beyond. Hate hate hate that (while I can understand how they think it may be a viable tactic). In that, I hope they fail.</blockquote>