Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Voss" data-source="post: 4076918" data-attributes="member: 57593">Also, the fighter apparently benefits from his sword or other weapon, both in accuracy and damage.&nbsp; The warlock gets zip for having to be dependent on his stick.&nbsp; It isn't adding anything to her attack rolls, which are straight charisma bonus for everything but the inexplicable wizard power, which is straight int bonus.&nbsp; It doesn't seem to have any relationship with damage either.&nbsp; So its just a penalty.Speaking of penalties, the fighter's marking ability is straight up awful, to the point that it fails at its purpose.&nbsp; -2 to attack rolls?&nbsp; oh no.&nbsp; That will make me... still attack the warlock, wizard or cleric, since even with the -2, the fighter's AC is 3 or more points higher, so I still have a better chance of hitting the squishy guys with less hit points.At least the paladin's mark has a chance of killing the enemy before he kills off your buddies.Kinda sad.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Voss, post: 4076918, member: 57593"] Also, the fighter apparently benefits from his sword or other weapon, both in accuracy and damage. The warlock gets zip for having to be dependent on his stick. It isn't adding anything to her attack rolls, which are straight charisma bonus for everything but the inexplicable wizard power, which is straight int bonus. It doesn't seem to have any relationship with damage either. So its just a penalty. Speaking of penalties, the fighter's marking ability is straight up awful, to the point that it fails at its purpose. -2 to attack rolls? oh no. That will make me... still attack the warlock, wizard or cleric, since even with the -2, the fighter's AC is 3 or more points higher, so I still have a better chance of hitting the squishy guys with less hit points. At least the paladin's mark has a chance of killing the enemy before he kills off your buddies. Kinda sad. [/QUOTE]

Verification