Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what about the SRDs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlyFlourish" data-source="post: 9631187" data-attributes="member: 54840"><p>I'm hoping to see it for that reason. Being able to take the new D&D 2024 monsters they choose to release and have them in other formats like Markdown or use them in tools like Owlbear Rodeo with its monster plugin. We'll hopefully see new character builders built for D&D 2024 even if they don't have all the stuff.</p><p></p><p>Some creators worry about using the new language D&D 2024 prefers without getting some sort of permission (like an SRD). I think they're probably overreacting but I can see why they'd worry about it.</p><p></p><p>The 5.2 SRD helps WOTC as much or more than it helps us. It means more creators and publishers will make more D&D 2024 compatible stuff. They run more Kickstarters. Some of those make lots of money. WOTC can then target those products to bring into D&D Beyond and know it's compatible with D&D 2024 (because of their use of the SRD) and then get their percentage.</p><p></p><p>This helps WOTC promote D&D 2024 even moreso.</p><p></p><p>This is exactly what Ryan Dansey intended for the 3rd edition SRD and I believe it worked then and it could work now.</p><p></p><p>The issues with Obojima only supporting D&D 2014 is a good case study in why it helps to have the D&D 2024 SRD out. Granted Obojima was released before D&D 2024 was so it wouldn't have helped then, but you can see why WOTC would want publishers to be writing against their current system instead of the old one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlyFlourish, post: 9631187, member: 54840"] I'm hoping to see it for that reason. Being able to take the new D&D 2024 monsters they choose to release and have them in other formats like Markdown or use them in tools like Owlbear Rodeo with its monster plugin. We'll hopefully see new character builders built for D&D 2024 even if they don't have all the stuff. Some creators worry about using the new language D&D 2024 prefers without getting some sort of permission (like an SRD). I think they're probably overreacting but I can see why they'd worry about it. The 5.2 SRD helps WOTC as much or more than it helps us. It means more creators and publishers will make more D&D 2024 compatible stuff. They run more Kickstarters. Some of those make lots of money. WOTC can then target those products to bring into D&D Beyond and know it's compatible with D&D 2024 (because of their use of the SRD) and then get their percentage. This helps WOTC promote D&D 2024 even moreso. This is exactly what Ryan Dansey intended for the 3rd edition SRD and I believe it worked then and it could work now. The issues with Obojima only supporting D&D 2014 is a good case study in why it helps to have the D&D 2024 SRD out. Granted Obojima was released before D&D 2024 was so it wouldn't have helped then, but you can see why WOTC would want publishers to be writing against their current system instead of the old one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what about the SRDs?
Top