Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what do we need from the Warlord?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6729799" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>It's almost impossible to discuss the Warlord and why it's wanted without discussing what it actually brings to the game (and why the Battlemaster and the Cunning Rogue fail miserably).</p><p></p><p>One of the key things about the Warlord is that it opens the game up massively in terms of what sort of party and in what sort of setting you play. Most D&D classes (including paladins and rangers) are utterly drenched in spellcasting. It's well known that <a href="http://www.therpgsite.com/showthread.php?t=7338" target="_blank">even in AD&D Gandalf was only a fifth level magic user</a>. And even more importantly not only was he only about fifth level, a fifth level magic user could cast about as many spells per day as Gandalf cast in the entire Lord of the Rings. And Gandalf was, in the two parties that make up the Fellowship of the Ring, the DMNPC. (In 5e any wizard or cleric casts spells far more frequently than Gandalf, of course).</p><p></p><p>So the default party or indeed any party with a single class wizard, cleric, bard, or in 5e ranger or paladin is unsuitable for high fantasy like Lord of the Rings, never mind the Sword and Sorcery you find in <a href="http://www.digital-eel.com/blog/ADnD_reading_list.htm" target="_blank">Appendix N</a>. (Jack Vance's archmages could memorise <em>maybe</em> half a dozen spells - or about the loadout of a 5th level A&D caster or 3rd level 3.X caster).</p><p></p><p>There is, of course nothing wrong with a high spellcaster game. But if we want to have a chance of playing Sword and Sorcery or even high fantasy <em>not</em> inspired by D&D we are going to have to put almost all the spellcasting classes in the round file, which in 5e means we only get to keep the warlock. No more powerful spellcaster belongs on the PC side in ... just about any sword and sorcery. (Of course with the limits imposed on martial characters we can't play classic fantasy like Orlando Furioso, Outlaws of the Water Margin, or Romance of the Three Kingdoms at all).</p><p></p><p>So. What happens when we kick out the wizard, sorcerer, druid, bard, ranger, paladin, and cleric? And instead go for a low magical group (basically leaving fighter, barbarian, rogue, and possibly monk and/or warlock)? The sort of conceptual group that makes up most sword and sorcery fantasy - or even classic fantasy.</p><p></p><p>By losing most of these classes, we lose a lot of ready made solutions-in-a-can. That's fine. In my experience group creativity goes up when there aren't ready made solutions presented.</p><p></p><p>But there's one class that's deeply embedded in the party makeup. One class that in 2e in particular people had to cajole each other to play. The cleric.</p><p></p><p>So what happens when we remove the cleric? Quite simply, the party dies. A lot. And they die for two reasons.</p><p></p><p>The first is that the mantra that the fighter can keep going all day is shown up for the rubbish it is. Fighters can keep going as long as they have hit points. Without Clerics (or 3.X style Wands of Cure Light Wounds) to keep them going fighters can fight until they run out of hit points. And the party can keep going until the <em>first</em> fighter runs out of hit points (or perhaps a little longer if you can give them a polearm or bow and have them drop back).</p><p></p><p>The second is spike damage. A random crit or set of high rolls are going to unexpectedly kill. A cleric has the healing spells to drop spike healing on someone, taking the edge off that. If the dice are running hot against one PC in specific the Cleric heals them and it takes the edge off it.</p><p></p><p>In order to play in most fantasy settings with D&D levels of focus on combat (you can play The Goblin Emperor all you like - D&D will have little to say about that) and without clerics you need either a huge grab bag of optional rules, or some way of taking the damage mitigation of the cleric and giving at least some of it to someone who isn't a spellcaster.</p><p></p><p>You need to be able to do the following. </p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Pick PCs on negative HP up off the ground and allow them to either join the fight or run away.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Prevent PCs being shafted by excessive damage spikes either through healing them after the event or through preventing the damage landing by means of an interrupt after the damage dice have been rolled. (Proactive healing like temporary hit points doesn't work unless used in overwhelming quantities due to not being able to predict when the dice will spike).</li> </ol><p></p><p>And this needs to be done without magic because otherwise D&D only actually works in worlds either that are excessively bloody (a problem given the levelling and power curve of any edition of D&D) or that are with a level of magic rarely seen outside D&D settings, World of Warcraft, or Harry Potter novels.</p><p></p><p>The warlord ticks all the boxes that are needed to allow high fantasy and sword and sorcery.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6729799, member: 87792"] It's almost impossible to discuss the Warlord and why it's wanted without discussing what it actually brings to the game (and why the Battlemaster and the Cunning Rogue fail miserably). One of the key things about the Warlord is that it opens the game up massively in terms of what sort of party and in what sort of setting you play. Most D&D classes (including paladins and rangers) are utterly drenched in spellcasting. It's well known that [URL="http://www.therpgsite.com/showthread.php?t=7338"]even in AD&D Gandalf was only a fifth level magic user[/URL]. And even more importantly not only was he only about fifth level, a fifth level magic user could cast about as many spells per day as Gandalf cast in the entire Lord of the Rings. And Gandalf was, in the two parties that make up the Fellowship of the Ring, the DMNPC. (In 5e any wizard or cleric casts spells far more frequently than Gandalf, of course). So the default party or indeed any party with a single class wizard, cleric, bard, or in 5e ranger or paladin is unsuitable for high fantasy like Lord of the Rings, never mind the Sword and Sorcery you find in [URL="http://www.digital-eel.com/blog/ADnD_reading_list.htm"]Appendix N[/URL]. (Jack Vance's archmages could memorise [I]maybe[/I] half a dozen spells - or about the loadout of a 5th level A&D caster or 3rd level 3.X caster). There is, of course nothing wrong with a high spellcaster game. But if we want to have a chance of playing Sword and Sorcery or even high fantasy [I]not[/I] inspired by D&D we are going to have to put almost all the spellcasting classes in the round file, which in 5e means we only get to keep the warlock. No more powerful spellcaster belongs on the PC side in ... just about any sword and sorcery. (Of course with the limits imposed on martial characters we can't play classic fantasy like Orlando Furioso, Outlaws of the Water Margin, or Romance of the Three Kingdoms at all). So. What happens when we kick out the wizard, sorcerer, druid, bard, ranger, paladin, and cleric? And instead go for a low magical group (basically leaving fighter, barbarian, rogue, and possibly monk and/or warlock)? The sort of conceptual group that makes up most sword and sorcery fantasy - or even classic fantasy. By losing most of these classes, we lose a lot of ready made solutions-in-a-can. That's fine. In my experience group creativity goes up when there aren't ready made solutions presented. But there's one class that's deeply embedded in the party makeup. One class that in 2e in particular people had to cajole each other to play. The cleric. So what happens when we remove the cleric? Quite simply, the party dies. A lot. And they die for two reasons. The first is that the mantra that the fighter can keep going all day is shown up for the rubbish it is. Fighters can keep going as long as they have hit points. Without Clerics (or 3.X style Wands of Cure Light Wounds) to keep them going fighters can fight until they run out of hit points. And the party can keep going until the [I]first[/I] fighter runs out of hit points (or perhaps a little longer if you can give them a polearm or bow and have them drop back). The second is spike damage. A random crit or set of high rolls are going to unexpectedly kill. A cleric has the healing spells to drop spike healing on someone, taking the edge off that. If the dice are running hot against one PC in specific the Cleric heals them and it takes the edge off it. In order to play in most fantasy settings with D&D levels of focus on combat (you can play The Goblin Emperor all you like - D&D will have little to say about that) and without clerics you need either a huge grab bag of optional rules, or some way of taking the damage mitigation of the cleric and giving at least some of it to someone who isn't a spellcaster. You need to be able to do the following. [LIST=1] [*]Pick PCs on negative HP up off the ground and allow them to either join the fight or run away. [*]Prevent PCs being shafted by excessive damage spikes either through healing them after the event or through preventing the damage landing by means of an interrupt after the damage dice have been rolled. (Proactive healing like temporary hit points doesn't work unless used in overwhelming quantities due to not being able to predict when the dice will spike). [/LIST] And this needs to be done without magic because otherwise D&D only actually works in worlds either that are excessively bloody (a problem given the levelling and power curve of any edition of D&D) or that are with a level of magic rarely seen outside D&D settings, World of Warcraft, or Harry Potter novels. The warlord ticks all the boxes that are needed to allow high fantasy and sword and sorcery. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what do we need from the Warlord?
Top