Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what do you think is wrong with Pathfinder? Post your problems and we will fix it.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6295290" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Because that's your interpretation of what the passage means... not what the actual passage says... it says that the martial power source isn't magic in the traditional sense... again if it isn't magical at all... why not just say martial power is not magic, as opposed to it is not magic in the traditional sense? IMO, that says it is magic, just not the type of magic that people are traditionally used to. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So with a high enough check you can spend 10 mins and read a language fluently. I don't care at what level it is likely that you do it reliably, it can be accomplished at even low levels with a high enough roll and the use of this ritual... SO yeah it does say what I claimed it did, contrary to your attempt at pedantry and rules minutia to make it seem otherwise.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where is all of this stated in the rules? Seriously, are you making the contention that a back-alley thief could encounter supernal or abyssal in the "school of hard knocks" frequently enough to learn to always understand it and sometimes read it fluently? That's your argument that makes more sense than it being magic in nature? Seriously?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The practice is infallible, by taking the practice the player has made it so that his character understands any language he encounters and if he rolls high enough he not only understands it but understands it fluently... but there's never a chance he doesn't know it or can't understand it, there's an infallibility factor that makes it nothing like Read Language which always had a chance to fail. IMO, this is magic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First, let's not kid ourselves, Aragorn does use magic, especially as it seems to be defined by Tolkien in Middle Earth... </p><p></p><p>As to the ritual, that's a great description but there is no cost requirement in the actual martial practice for materials to actually do this...only the expenditure of a healing surge... Could Aragorn through stress and fatigue, naked on a featureless plain conjure the materials and supplies necessary to set these infallible tripwires and wards around a campsite? I don't think he could, unless of course he was a martial character in 4e since there are no materials required (explained as a gp cost to perform the practice in MP 2)... sure sounds like magic (specifically a warding spell) to me...</p><p></p><p>It sure seems like martial power is just magic fueled by the physical as opposed to the mental (psionics), arcane, divine, primal, etc. sourcess of other magic... for another example of this in other games look at the Dawn caste in Exalted, or the adepts in Earthdawn and Shadowrun... they just use less ambiguous language when presenting it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6295290, member: 48965"] Because that's your interpretation of what the passage means... not what the actual passage says... it says that the martial power source isn't magic in the traditional sense... again if it isn't magical at all... why not just say martial power is not magic, as opposed to it is not magic in the traditional sense? IMO, that says it is magic, just not the type of magic that people are traditionally used to. So with a high enough check you can spend 10 mins and read a language fluently. I don't care at what level it is likely that you do it reliably, it can be accomplished at even low levels with a high enough roll and the use of this ritual... SO yeah it does say what I claimed it did, contrary to your attempt at pedantry and rules minutia to make it seem otherwise. Where is all of this stated in the rules? Seriously, are you making the contention that a back-alley thief could encounter supernal or abyssal in the "school of hard knocks" frequently enough to learn to always understand it and sometimes read it fluently? That's your argument that makes more sense than it being magic in nature? Seriously? The practice is infallible, by taking the practice the player has made it so that his character understands any language he encounters and if he rolls high enough he not only understands it but understands it fluently... but there's never a chance he doesn't know it or can't understand it, there's an infallibility factor that makes it nothing like Read Language which always had a chance to fail. IMO, this is magic. First, let's not kid ourselves, Aragorn does use magic, especially as it seems to be defined by Tolkien in Middle Earth... As to the ritual, that's a great description but there is no cost requirement in the actual martial practice for materials to actually do this...only the expenditure of a healing surge... Could Aragorn through stress and fatigue, naked on a featureless plain conjure the materials and supplies necessary to set these infallible tripwires and wards around a campsite? I don't think he could, unless of course he was a martial character in 4e since there are no materials required (explained as a gp cost to perform the practice in MP 2)... sure sounds like magic (specifically a warding spell) to me... It sure seems like martial power is just magic fueled by the physical as opposed to the mental (psionics), arcane, divine, primal, etc. sourcess of other magic... for another example of this in other games look at the Dawn caste in Exalted, or the adepts in Earthdawn and Shadowrun... they just use less ambiguous language when presenting it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what do you think is wrong with Pathfinder? Post your problems and we will fix it.
Top