Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what do you think is wrong with Pathfinder? Post your problems and we will fix it.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6295464" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">The game is leaving these things open to an extent... And none of what you posted above has anything to do with the martial power soiurce, let's not confuse the issues...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except they do link the martial power source by specifically using the term <strong>"non-traditional magic"</strong>...</p><p></p><p>If I say something is a non-traditional society... that means it is a society that is non-traditional...</p><p></p><p>If I say they had a non-traditional marriage... the people I am referring to still had a marriage but it was done in a non-traditional manner...</p><p></p><p>Phrasing the martial power source as non-traditional magic was deliberate and categorizes it as magic but of a non-traditional bent. I've never seen non-traditional used in the manner you seem to think it is being used here... mainly that non-traditional magic equates to not magic whatsoever... Or whatever you want to call it...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Never said he used spells or prayers... but claiming those are the only types of magic is where you are wrong, even in D&D those aren't the only types of magic and D&D 4e specifically calls out the martial power source as a type of non-traditional magic...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Does this practice cover all languages? If I roll a 30 am I or am I not reading whatever language I have chosen fluently? Please just answer these two questions with a yes or no... </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I covered the main difference in my earlier post... the practice, when used, is infallible... Decipher Script when used is never 100%... </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow, so you're claiming the conceits of 4e are that the very language of creation can be learned in the back alleys of the streets... Remind me again what PC race or class starts with Supernal as a language?? In fact originally wasn't it impossible for a 1st level PC to learn supernal?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well I would say that it's because the actual written alphabet is Draconic, which is used by much more mundane creatures such as kobolds and lizardfolk which means there are creatures a 1st level thief could conceivably have interacted with and learn something of the written word he's starring at. It's nothing like the Supernal language of 4e, which is the language of gods, devils and angels... </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the character can, 10 secs later spend a healing surge and read it... the practice when used is infallible... Decipher Script when used isn't. That isn't fiction it's mechanical resolution of those two mechanics when used in the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unless of course the book says it's a form of magic... a non-traditional form...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Go back and re-read the section on the Decipher Script skill in 3e... there is no limit, it states "30 or higher" which means there is always the possibility that one can run into something that is indecipherable... One can even interpret the writings incorrectly... Neither of these is the case in 4e... The practice gives on infallibility... and yes that sounds like magic to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That would be a great way to hand wave the fact that all it requires is exerting oneself... of course on page 147 of MP 2 it states...</p><p></p><p><strong>Component Costs:</strong>...</p><p></p><p>A few martial practices also require materials to properly perform them. When a practice has a component cost, you must pay the price from your store of treasure, whether you're spending gold gems or other valuables. <strong>the component cost represents the price of equipment and raw materials.</strong> </p><p></p><p>So yeah it specifically has no materials associated with it regardless of what the (mutable??) fluff claims...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Conan would still need materials to pull it off...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, re-read the 3e Decipher Script skill... they are never infallible. And the general rules for practices do in fact cover the case of having materials, the fact is that the practice specifically doesn't require materials... and yeah that's (non-traditional) magic IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6295464, member: 48965"] [INDENT] The game is leaving these things open to an extent... And none of what you posted above has anything to do with the martial power soiurce, let's not confuse the issues...[/INDENT] Except they do link the martial power source by specifically using the term [B]"non-traditional magic"[/B]... If I say something is a non-traditional society... that means it is a society that is non-traditional... If I say they had a non-traditional marriage... the people I am referring to still had a marriage but it was done in a non-traditional manner... Phrasing the martial power source as non-traditional magic was deliberate and categorizes it as magic but of a non-traditional bent. I've never seen non-traditional used in the manner you seem to think it is being used here... mainly that non-traditional magic equates to not magic whatsoever... Or whatever you want to call it... Never said he used spells or prayers... but claiming those are the only types of magic is where you are wrong, even in D&D those aren't the only types of magic and D&D 4e specifically calls out the martial power source as a type of non-traditional magic... Does this practice cover all languages? If I roll a 30 am I or am I not reading whatever language I have chosen fluently? Please just answer these two questions with a yes or no... I covered the main difference in my earlier post... the practice, when used, is infallible... Decipher Script when used is never 100%... Wow, so you're claiming the conceits of 4e are that the very language of creation can be learned in the back alleys of the streets... Remind me again what PC race or class starts with Supernal as a language?? In fact originally wasn't it impossible for a 1st level PC to learn supernal? Well I would say that it's because the actual written alphabet is Draconic, which is used by much more mundane creatures such as kobolds and lizardfolk which means there are creatures a 1st level thief could conceivably have interacted with and learn something of the written word he's starring at. It's nothing like the Supernal language of 4e, which is the language of gods, devils and angels... But the character can, 10 secs later spend a healing surge and read it... the practice when used is infallible... Decipher Script when used isn't. That isn't fiction it's mechanical resolution of those two mechanics when used in the game. Unless of course the book says it's a form of magic... a non-traditional form... Go back and re-read the section on the Decipher Script skill in 3e... there is no limit, it states "30 or higher" which means there is always the possibility that one can run into something that is indecipherable... One can even interpret the writings incorrectly... Neither of these is the case in 4e... The practice gives on infallibility... and yes that sounds like magic to me. That would be a great way to hand wave the fact that all it requires is exerting oneself... of course on page 147 of MP 2 it states... [B]Component Costs:[/B]... A few martial practices also require materials to properly perform them. When a practice has a component cost, you must pay the price from your store of treasure, whether you're spending gold gems or other valuables. [B]the component cost represents the price of equipment and raw materials.[/B] So yeah it specifically has no materials associated with it regardless of what the (mutable??) fluff claims... Conan would still need materials to pull it off... Again, re-read the 3e Decipher Script skill... they are never infallible. And the general rules for practices do in fact cover the case of having materials, the fact is that the practice specifically doesn't require materials... and yeah that's (non-traditional) magic IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what do you think is wrong with Pathfinder? Post your problems and we will fix it.
Top