Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, what does the Artificer "replace"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9818582" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Artificer would struggle to replace the Wizard. You might be able to pull it off, but it wouldn't be a clean fit.</p><p></p><p>Artificer probably cannot replace a Fighter, even with the appropriate subclass. I could see them being a decent "off-Fighter" if we wish to view it that way.</p><p></p><p>That leaves Healer and Lurker/Skillmonkey. The spell list makes healing doable, but not nearly at the level of a Cleric....but subclasses fill that hole. So yes, an Artificer <em>can</em> replace a Cleric, I'd say, based on their spell list. I can also see an Artificer that replaces a Rogue, and is focused on utility effects and spells, scouting, stealth, etc. The Armorer subclass can fill <em>parts</em> of the Fighter role, namely the defensive parts, to some degree. In 4e terms, the Artificer can "flex" into a defensive direction, but will have to do a lot of the heavy lifting themselves (or from other sources, e.g. physiological features, background, equipment, etc.)</p><p></p><p>So...yeah. Artificer fits into Cleric and/or Rogue space. It has certain similarities to Bard.</p><p></p><p>Also, just to point out...these are extremely close to the roles of 4e. Bard and Ranger are the only two classes listed which appear on multiple lists. 4e Bard could MC into any other class--thus giving it amazing flexibility for building into any role the player wanted. Rangers were surprisingly hardy for a Striker...and did do skill-y things in addition to fight-y things.</p><p></p><p>Just find it so funny that people rail and rail and rail against roles....and then everyone goes back to agreeing that roles do in fact exist in practice, that the game is in fact designed with such thoughts and expectations, and that <em>despite</em> this fact, people have always been able to play what they want and not give a damn about it. It's just bitterly hilarious that <em>we all TALK about</em> classes as having roles....but having the books in any way <em>recognize</em> that they have roles? You've just destroyed everything good and right and true! How <em>dare</em> you! Nerf darts at dawn!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9818582, member: 6790260"] Artificer would struggle to replace the Wizard. You might be able to pull it off, but it wouldn't be a clean fit. Artificer probably cannot replace a Fighter, even with the appropriate subclass. I could see them being a decent "off-Fighter" if we wish to view it that way. That leaves Healer and Lurker/Skillmonkey. The spell list makes healing doable, but not nearly at the level of a Cleric....but subclasses fill that hole. So yes, an Artificer [I]can[/I] replace a Cleric, I'd say, based on their spell list. I can also see an Artificer that replaces a Rogue, and is focused on utility effects and spells, scouting, stealth, etc. The Armorer subclass can fill [I]parts[/I] of the Fighter role, namely the defensive parts, to some degree. In 4e terms, the Artificer can "flex" into a defensive direction, but will have to do a lot of the heavy lifting themselves (or from other sources, e.g. physiological features, background, equipment, etc.) So...yeah. Artificer fits into Cleric and/or Rogue space. It has certain similarities to Bard. Also, just to point out...these are extremely close to the roles of 4e. Bard and Ranger are the only two classes listed which appear on multiple lists. 4e Bard could MC into any other class--thus giving it amazing flexibility for building into any role the player wanted. Rangers were surprisingly hardy for a Striker...and did do skill-y things in addition to fight-y things. Just find it so funny that people rail and rail and rail against roles....and then everyone goes back to agreeing that roles do in fact exist in practice, that the game is in fact designed with such thoughts and expectations, and that [I]despite[/I] this fact, people have always been able to play what they want and not give a damn about it. It's just bitterly hilarious that [I]we all TALK about[/I] classes as having roles....but having the books in any way [I]recognize[/I] that they have roles? You've just destroyed everything good and right and true! How [I]dare[/I] you! Nerf darts at dawn!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So, what does the Artificer "replace"?
Top