Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 3044656" data-attributes="member: 4134">Not quite. You can expect about a fifth to a quarter of the set being actually on theme (demons, devils, 'loths, fiendish critters, aspects of archfiends, evil followers of parties involved), and the rest will be generic stuff.So you act all annoyed at people wanting demons, when at the same time complaining about the lack of gnomes?Not that I disagree about the gnomes (Holy Liberator during the Crusade and all), but when complaining about the lack of X, you shouldn't begrudge others when they want Y.Gem Dragons are non-standard dragons. With two exceptions (Deep Dragon and Fang Dragon), they cleft to the core dragons. We might see gemmies at some point.Aquatics aren't necessarily ignored - they did tell us that we shouldn't hold our breath for them, as they won't fit in and therefore probably won't be done in the foreseeable future. Amphibic stuff is an exception, since they can perfectly well move about on land.It's not really reasonable to drop elves (and dwarves) altogether (though we could do without axedwarves and hammerdwarves for some time - there are other options for the buggers) because gnomes are so rare. They should keep them coming.And I guess more than two in a set would be a bit much. I do think that the sets after that will contain more gnomes, though.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 3044656, member: 4134"] Not quite. You can expect about a fifth to a quarter of the set being actually on theme (demons, devils, 'loths, fiendish critters, aspects of archfiends, evil followers of parties involved), and the rest will be generic stuff. So you act all annoyed at people wanting demons, when at the same time complaining about the lack of gnomes? Not that I disagree about the gnomes (Holy Liberator during the Crusade and all), but when complaining about the lack of X, you shouldn't begrudge others when they want Y. Gem Dragons are non-standard dragons. With two exceptions (Deep Dragon and Fang Dragon), they cleft to the core dragons. We might see gemmies at some point. Aquatics aren't necessarily ignored - they did tell us that we shouldn't hold our breath for them, as they won't fit in and therefore probably won't be done in the foreseeable future. Amphibic stuff is an exception, since they can perfectly well move about on land. It's not really reasonable to drop elves (and dwarves) altogether (though we could do without axedwarves and hammerdwarves for some time - there are other options for the buggers) because gnomes are so rare. They should keep them coming. And I guess more than two in a set would be a bit much. I do think that the sets after that will contain more gnomes, though. [/QUOTE]

Verification