Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what is edition bashing anyway?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5896912" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>What matters is the relevancy and the justification. You can be as critical as you like as long as </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You have an actual reason you can back up</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is based on the game not the players of that game</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It is relevant to the conversation</li> </ul><p>In reverse order:</p><p> </p><p>You can't just drop into a thread and say 4e, 3e, AD&D, OSRIC, or even <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/Worst_RPGs_ever&sa=U&ei=CNKfT6ztFIbP4QTFwayIAw&ved=0CBQQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNHw0vOGtcRsNUmqsact6amZTVrvEw" target="_blank">FATAL</a> suck. (Even if FATAL does). It adds nothing constructive to the thread. And is going to annoy people as well as waste their time reading what you've written.</p><p> </p><p>Never attack the players. And this includes saying that the game is suitable for idiots/rollplayers/people who can't handle complexity. You're going to just annoy half the audience. And although some preferences can make you a bad person, your taste in D&D editions is not one of them. (Your taste in roleplaying game systems might show you to be a bad person if you're actually a fan of FATAL or RaHoWa but those both are about the assumed gameworld and are extreme outliers). Seriously, just never say anything about the players of any given game. Or that a game is for people who like [anything derogatory].</p><p> </p><p>And you need to be able to give reasons. One of the posters I like reading on this board is [MENTION=29398]Lanefan[/MENTION] - and he's a fairly hard line 1e fan. When it comes to RPGs I really don't look for the same things he does. Which makes reading him interesting - he has a different perspective to mine. If you can give reasons for disliking things and can justify them there's no problem with disagreeing although you may get disagreed with for your reasons. If you just say you don't like something it adds no useful information to the discussion. Also giving your reasons leaves you open to being engaged with and potentially even having your mind changed. I used to think the 1e XP for GP rule sucked - why reward people twice? But I now really like it because I understand what it is designed to do - incentivise people for looting without fighting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5896912, member: 87792"] What matters is the relevancy and the justification. You can be as critical as you like as long as [LIST] [*]You have an actual reason you can back up [*]It is based on the game not the players of that game [*]It is relevant to the conversation [/LIST]In reverse order: You can't just drop into a thread and say 4e, 3e, AD&D, OSRIC, or even [url=http://www.google.co.uk/url?q=http://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/Worst_RPGs_ever&sa=U&ei=CNKfT6ztFIbP4QTFwayIAw&ved=0CBQQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNHw0vOGtcRsNUmqsact6amZTVrvEw]FATAL[/url] suck. (Even if FATAL does). It adds nothing constructive to the thread. And is going to annoy people as well as waste their time reading what you've written. Never attack the players. And this includes saying that the game is suitable for idiots/rollplayers/people who can't handle complexity. You're going to just annoy half the audience. And although some preferences can make you a bad person, your taste in D&D editions is not one of them. (Your taste in roleplaying game systems might show you to be a bad person if you're actually a fan of FATAL or RaHoWa but those both are about the assumed gameworld and are extreme outliers). Seriously, just never say anything about the players of any given game. Or that a game is for people who like [anything derogatory]. And you need to be able to give reasons. One of the posters I like reading on this board is [MENTION=29398]Lanefan[/MENTION] - and he's a fairly hard line 1e fan. When it comes to RPGs I really don't look for the same things he does. Which makes reading him interesting - he has a different perspective to mine. If you can give reasons for disliking things and can justify them there's no problem with disagreeing although you may get disagreed with for your reasons. If you just say you don't like something it adds no useful information to the discussion. Also giving your reasons leaves you open to being engaged with and potentially even having your mind changed. I used to think the 1e XP for GP rule sucked - why reward people twice? But I now really like it because I understand what it is designed to do - incentivise people for looting without fighting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what is edition bashing anyway?
Top