Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what races and classes do we consider core?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 5772756" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>WotC already pretty much have that data, through the DDI. According to Klaus over on Circvs Maximvs, Humans are by far the most played race, followed by Elves and the Dwarves. He doesn't go beyond that, save to note that those are the <em>overwhelming</em> favourites.</p><p></p><p>However, I (mostly) agree with you: the game should include Humans, Elves, Dwarves and Halflings regardless; if it goes beyond the 'classic 4' in the Core, then it should base those selected purely on actual popularity.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That point, in isolation, does. In a perfect world, the PHB would have enough room for dozens of fully-detailed classes.</p><p></p><p>However, if the choice is "twenty bare-bones classes" or "eight fully-detailed" classes, then <em>my preference</em> is the latter - I want to be able to play "Core Rules Only" without feeling overly limited. I want "less, done well" rather than "more sketched out". YMMV, of course. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've re-grouped these two paragraphs, as I think they go together. I think there's certainly a lot of truth in your assertion of the weakness of some of the archetypes. Conversely, I would note that while there are relatively few people playing, say, Runepriests, I think it's a good bet that for <em>someone</em> out there, the class was a revelation, was what they didn't know they always wanted, and instantly became their new favourite. Does that person not deserve support?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They're two sides to the same coin. I did see plenty of people demanding more support for the 'minor' classes in 4e. But, due to cruel economics, they rarely got it. And so, to get decent support for their chosen classes, they had to gather together every little scrap of support they got.</p><p></p><p>It's tricky. I wouldn't really want to be in WotC's current position, since they can't please everyone. If they do decide to go with "lots of bare-bones classes", I'll certainly understand them taking that choice. It's just not my preferred way forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 5772756, member: 22424"] WotC already pretty much have that data, through the DDI. According to Klaus over on Circvs Maximvs, Humans are by far the most played race, followed by Elves and the Dwarves. He doesn't go beyond that, save to note that those are the [i]overwhelming[/i] favourites. However, I (mostly) agree with you: the game should include Humans, Elves, Dwarves and Halflings regardless; if it goes beyond the 'classic 4' in the Core, then it should base those selected purely on actual popularity. That point, in isolation, does. In a perfect world, the PHB would have enough room for dozens of fully-detailed classes. However, if the choice is "twenty bare-bones classes" or "eight fully-detailed" classes, then [i]my preference[/i] is the latter - I want to be able to play "Core Rules Only" without feeling overly limited. I want "less, done well" rather than "more sketched out". YMMV, of course. :) I've re-grouped these two paragraphs, as I think they go together. I think there's certainly a lot of truth in your assertion of the weakness of some of the archetypes. Conversely, I would note that while there are relatively few people playing, say, Runepriests, I think it's a good bet that for [i]someone[/i] out there, the class was a revelation, was what they didn't know they always wanted, and instantly became their new favourite. Does that person not deserve support? They're two sides to the same coin. I did see plenty of people demanding more support for the 'minor' classes in 4e. But, due to cruel economics, they rarely got it. And so, to get decent support for their chosen classes, they had to gather together every little scrap of support they got. It's tricky. I wouldn't really want to be in WotC's current position, since they can't please everyone. If they do decide to go with "lots of bare-bones classes", I'll certainly understand them taking that choice. It's just not my preferred way forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So what races and classes do we consider core?
Top