Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashkelon" data-source="post: 6655442" data-attributes="member: 6774887"><p>Not to mention that feats really don't even give the fighter much of an edge. The most commonly touted feats for non-combat capabilities are Actor, Observant, and Skilled. </p><p></p><p>Actor gives you advantage on Persuasion and Deception, but only when you are attempting to impersonate someone else. I don't know about you, but most Persuasion and Deception checks I make aren't when I'm pretending to be somebody else. Besides, to really make good use of this feat you need a good charisma score or expertise in those skills. The fighter will usually have neither. Generally, even with this feat, the party warlock, paladin, or sorcerer will have a better chance to impersonate others than the 12 Cha fighter. </p><p></p><p>Observant suffers a similar problem to actor. Their are other party members who will typically be better at being "observant" than a fighter who takes this feat.</p><p></p><p>Skilled is great, but it is giving you your 5th, 6th, and 7th favorite skills as your number 1 to 4 choice is probably already taken by your free class skills and background. And again, you won't ever be better than someone in your party with the appropriate primary attribute and proficiency (or expertise).</p><p></p><p>Those feats definitely give you some breadth, but they don't allow you to actually be better than most of your party members who didn't even need to devote resources to their non combat utility. What is worse, those feats cannot hope to match most other classes non combat features. </p><p></p><p>Take a level 10 fighter for example. He has 1 more feat than everyone but a rogue. Is a feat as good as a bards Jack of all trades, inspiration, expertise and spells? Is 1 more feat as good as a Rangers spells and favored enemy/terrain? Is 1 more feat as good as a Paladins immunity to fear, aura thy protects allies, 50 HP lay on hands, divine sense, and spells? Is 1 more feat as good as warlock invocations like at-will Jump, levitate, or disguise self? Those classes can all do about as much, or more damage than the fighter, but also gain tons of utility. I'm really not seeing how Actor, Observant, or Skilled can come close to matching the non combat potential of most of those abilities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashkelon, post: 6655442, member: 6774887"] Not to mention that feats really don't even give the fighter much of an edge. The most commonly touted feats for non-combat capabilities are Actor, Observant, and Skilled. Actor gives you advantage on Persuasion and Deception, but only when you are attempting to impersonate someone else. I don't know about you, but most Persuasion and Deception checks I make aren't when I'm pretending to be somebody else. Besides, to really make good use of this feat you need a good charisma score or expertise in those skills. The fighter will usually have neither. Generally, even with this feat, the party warlock, paladin, or sorcerer will have a better chance to impersonate others than the 12 Cha fighter. Observant suffers a similar problem to actor. Their are other party members who will typically be better at being "observant" than a fighter who takes this feat. Skilled is great, but it is giving you your 5th, 6th, and 7th favorite skills as your number 1 to 4 choice is probably already taken by your free class skills and background. And again, you won't ever be better than someone in your party with the appropriate primary attribute and proficiency (or expertise). Those feats definitely give you some breadth, but they don't allow you to actually be better than most of your party members who didn't even need to devote resources to their non combat utility. What is worse, those feats cannot hope to match most other classes non combat features. Take a level 10 fighter for example. He has 1 more feat than everyone but a rogue. Is a feat as good as a bards Jack of all trades, inspiration, expertise and spells? Is 1 more feat as good as a Rangers spells and favored enemy/terrain? Is 1 more feat as good as a Paladins immunity to fear, aura thy protects allies, 50 HP lay on hands, divine sense, and spells? Is 1 more feat as good as warlock invocations like at-will Jump, levitate, or disguise self? Those classes can all do about as much, or more damage than the fighter, but also gain tons of utility. I'm really not seeing how Actor, Observant, or Skilled can come close to matching the non combat potential of most of those abilities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
Top