Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6663278" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Why would you want something as limited as Crack the Shell when you can play 3E/<em>Pathfinder</em> and have Sunder? Or Stunning Attack? Or a martial arts style? Or Intimidating Prowess that allows you to use the intimidate skill to scare demons with a glare? I had a Fighter in high level <em>Pathfinder</em> that started down a demons and dragons he was so damn intimidating. They called him The General. He gave a command and no one questioned it. His entire persona was one of fear and discipline. No one could withstand his intimidating glare except a paladin with immunity to fright. </p><p></p><p>All the things you seem to be asking for were created in <em>Pathfinder</em> and expanded on <em>Mythic Adventures</em>. Why do you think my group loved <em>Pathfinder</em> more than 4E? Because you could create this amazingly versatile and powerful martials. The majority of my group prefers martial characters or some kind of martial hybrid. They had tons of fun making characters in the <em>Pathfinder</em> system because it added so many options over even 3.5. </p><p></p><p>I took care of limiting spells on the backend to ensure the caster-martial disparity did not affect spotlight disparity. I don't like casters usurping what I've designed martial characters either. I always had one player that liked to play casters trying to take out the enemy I designed for the martial characters because he figured he had a weak Will save. I made sure that didn't happen as a DM because it's annoying. When I create a martial enemy I want to see that mano y mano fight between two badass martials play out. When some annoying caster decides he wants to interfere, I take care of that as a DM with a magic item or buff or an enemy that gives that caster no time to spend on some other enemy. </p><p></p><p>If you want a badass martial, take a look at <em>Pathfinder</em>. It's a far better system than 4E was for building an amazingly versatile and badass martial character. Even when we switched to 5E, my martial loving players had ten or more concepts for martial characters they still wanted to try after already having tried just as many.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6663278, member: 5834"] Why would you want something as limited as Crack the Shell when you can play 3E/[I]Pathfinder[/I] and have Sunder? Or Stunning Attack? Or a martial arts style? Or Intimidating Prowess that allows you to use the intimidate skill to scare demons with a glare? I had a Fighter in high level [I]Pathfinder[/I] that started down a demons and dragons he was so damn intimidating. They called him The General. He gave a command and no one questioned it. His entire persona was one of fear and discipline. No one could withstand his intimidating glare except a paladin with immunity to fright. All the things you seem to be asking for were created in [I]Pathfinder[/I] and expanded on [I]Mythic Adventures[/I]. Why do you think my group loved [I]Pathfinder[/I] more than 4E? Because you could create this amazingly versatile and powerful martials. The majority of my group prefers martial characters or some kind of martial hybrid. They had tons of fun making characters in the [I]Pathfinder[/I] system because it added so many options over even 3.5. I took care of limiting spells on the backend to ensure the caster-martial disparity did not affect spotlight disparity. I don't like casters usurping what I've designed martial characters either. I always had one player that liked to play casters trying to take out the enemy I designed for the martial characters because he figured he had a weak Will save. I made sure that didn't happen as a DM because it's annoying. When I create a martial enemy I want to see that mano y mano fight between two badass martials play out. When some annoying caster decides he wants to interfere, I take care of that as a DM with a magic item or buff or an enemy that gives that caster no time to spend on some other enemy. If you want a badass martial, take a look at [I]Pathfinder[/I]. It's a far better system than 4E was for building an amazingly versatile and badass martial character. Even when we switched to 5E, my martial loving players had ten or more concepts for martial characters they still wanted to try after already having tried just as many. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
Top