Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6664653" data-attributes="member: 48965">Well if a game takes a certain approach to something (Eldritch Knight and Monk as supernatural warriors)...and you don't like it...and (assuming said poll is at least in the correct ballpark) you are a pretty small minority of customers.  I'd say yeah... you do need to figure it out... It's probably not going to be a priority for WotC.  No one believes you and others who have voiced similar opinions about this are "okay with the way things are"... but the question is if 80+% of players are ok with it,should WotC waste the resources and efforts creating a new fighter for that other 20-% or should they probably be looking at something else that caters to the 80 or even 100% of 5e players?SMH... those people didn't have the mechanical and fictional elements they wanted... it was the inability of the other side to accept as opposed to dismiss that fact which caused all the arguments.Wait so now you want Mythical warriors with no magic whatsoever, not just spellcasting and slots but absolutely no mention of magic like say the blood of a god running through their veins like Hercules or being an actual demigod like Gilgamesh.  What else is that besides a form of magic.  How about this, instead of giving examples define what a "Mythical warrior" is...</blockquote>