Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashkelon" data-source="post: 6664842" data-attributes="member: 6774887">Mainly, I wanted to play D&amp;D with my friends. I typically like martial characters, and I absolutely loathe anything to do with vancian spell slots. That limited my options significantly. My options were barbarian, rogue, or fighter.I decided on fighter because my first 3e and 4e characters were both fighters. I figured it couldn't be too bad.I think I was too used to the interesting and unique capabilities of late 3e fighters/warblades and 4e fighters. I missed having interesting options usable on a round by round basis. I missed depth and complexity. I missed resource management per encounter, instead of superiority dice which IMHO take all the worst parts of 4e encounter powers and combine them into an atrocious amalgamation.I went into the game with an open mind, but quickly felt bored during combat. I stuck with it til the end of the campaign though as it was a friends game.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashkelon, post: 6664842, member: 6774887"] Mainly, I wanted to play D&D with my friends. I typically like martial characters, and I absolutely loathe anything to do with vancian spell slots. That limited my options significantly. My options were barbarian, rogue, or fighter. I decided on fighter because my first 3e and 4e characters were both fighters. I figured it couldn't be too bad. I think I was too used to the interesting and unique capabilities of late 3e fighters/warblades and 4e fighters. I missed having interesting options usable on a round by round basis. I missed depth and complexity. I missed resource management per encounter, instead of superiority dice which IMHO take all the worst parts of 4e encounter powers and combine them into an atrocious amalgamation. I went into the game with an open mind, but quickly felt bored during combat. I stuck with it til the end of the campaign though as it was a friends game. [/QUOTE]

Verification