Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashkelon" data-source="post: 6665615" data-attributes="member: 6774887"><p>Outside of combat, the fighter can ONLY do what everyone else can also do (same access to feats, skills, backgrounds, etc).</p><p></p><p>Every other class can do what the fighter can, but also has access to things that make them extraordinary outside of combat. Some classes have expertise, some have spells, some have invocations, some have shape-changing, some can walk on water and jump super far (Multiple times further than the fighter). Sure, the fighter can contribute to a non combat encounter but only at the bare minimum by which everyone else already could. </p><p></p><p>Two PCs with the same attribute and proficiency are equally capable in non combat situations. But the one who can cast enhance ability giving him advantage on his rolls has a significant edge. The PC who has expertise or reliable talent has a significant edge. The PC who can cast a spell to bypass an otherwise deadly challenge with unsure results has the edge. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately, there is nothing wrong with the fighter being the worst class when it comes to non combat utility. After all, some class had to be the worst at it. And being the worst doesn't mean you can't contribute. You can still contribute just fine. You will never be amazing at any particular non combat task, but you will perform well enough. I just hope that when they make a more inspired martial class that it actually has some non combat capability above in beyond the baseline.</p><p></p><p>Hell, I would even be fine with a variant fighter replacing second wind with this: </p><p>Physical Expertise - double your proficiency bonus for any Strength (Athletics) check you make. You also gain proficiency with STR and CON checks.</p><p></p><p>It is nice way to give the fighter variant a way to really shine when it comes to physical tasks. He will of course still be worse off than a rogue with both expertise and reliable talent, or a bard with expertise and enhance ability, but that is fine. The variant fighter doesn't need to be the best at physical related tasks. It would just be nice if he was better than the baseline.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashkelon, post: 6665615, member: 6774887"] Outside of combat, the fighter can ONLY do what everyone else can also do (same access to feats, skills, backgrounds, etc). Every other class can do what the fighter can, but also has access to things that make them extraordinary outside of combat. Some classes have expertise, some have spells, some have invocations, some have shape-changing, some can walk on water and jump super far (Multiple times further than the fighter). Sure, the fighter can contribute to a non combat encounter but only at the bare minimum by which everyone else already could. Two PCs with the same attribute and proficiency are equally capable in non combat situations. But the one who can cast enhance ability giving him advantage on his rolls has a significant edge. The PC who has expertise or reliable talent has a significant edge. The PC who can cast a spell to bypass an otherwise deadly challenge with unsure results has the edge. Ultimately, there is nothing wrong with the fighter being the worst class when it comes to non combat utility. After all, some class had to be the worst at it. And being the worst doesn't mean you can't contribute. You can still contribute just fine. You will never be amazing at any particular non combat task, but you will perform well enough. I just hope that when they make a more inspired martial class that it actually has some non combat capability above in beyond the baseline. Hell, I would even be fine with a variant fighter replacing second wind with this: Physical Expertise - double your proficiency bonus for any Strength (Athletics) check you make. You also gain proficiency with STR and CON checks. It is nice way to give the fighter variant a way to really shine when it comes to physical tasks. He will of course still be worse off than a rogue with both expertise and reliable talent, or a bard with expertise and enhance ability, but that is fine. The variant fighter doesn't need to be the best at physical related tasks. It would just be nice if he was better than the baseline. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So what's exactly wrong with the fighter?
Top