Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So What's In Kobold Press' BLACK FLAG First Playtest?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaeger" data-source="post: 8937912" data-attributes="member: 27996"><p>There is also a middle ground of design between core 5e, and rules light B&B, 5 torches deep, into the unknown.</p><p></p><p>No one has treaded that 5e middle ground design paradigm yet. </p><p></p><p>They have either explicitly added crunch like Level up, or gone total rules light like B&B, 5 torches deep, and Into the unknown.</p><p></p><p>I think that there is a market for a streamlined, but not quite rules light version of 5e.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But even in the preview packet - they already have some thing that if followed to their natural conclusion means that all past published subclass options will not be valid.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What are the design goals?</p><p></p><p>Define exactly how 'backwards compatible' project BF will be:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Because even from the preview given, I don't see how that can be 100% true.</p><p></p><p>If you really are going to have 'innovation' in the core rules, then it really can't be true.</p><p></p><p>If it is going to be a cleaned up clone; then explicitly come out an say so.</p><p></p><p>If you are looking to refine 5e from the ground up; come out and say so.</p><p></p><p>Playtest groups cannot give constructive feedback without understanding the overall design intent.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I did give feedback in the link...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaeger, post: 8937912, member: 27996"] There is also a middle ground of design between core 5e, and rules light B&B, 5 torches deep, into the unknown. No one has treaded that 5e middle ground design paradigm yet. They have either explicitly added crunch like Level up, or gone total rules light like B&B, 5 torches deep, and Into the unknown. I think that there is a market for a streamlined, but not quite rules light version of 5e. But even in the preview packet - they already have some thing that if followed to their natural conclusion means that all past published subclass options will not be valid. What are the design goals? Define exactly how 'backwards compatible' project BF will be: Because even from the preview given, I don't see how that can be 100% true. If you really are going to have 'innovation' in the core rules, then it really can't be true. If it is going to be a cleaned up clone; then explicitly come out an say so. If you are looking to refine 5e from the ground up; come out and say so. Playtest groups cannot give constructive feedback without understanding the overall design intent. And yes, I did give feedback in the link... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So What's In Kobold Press' BLACK FLAG First Playtest?
Top