Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So Where my Witches at?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowdweller00" data-source="post: 8174724" data-attributes="member: 6778479"><p>What makes a spellcaster "witchy" is their motivation, methodology, and personal style. Not their base skillset. What differentiates an hunter or soldier from a villain in a slasher movie is their choice of prey...plus maybe some scarring, deformity, and history of inbreeding. You have all sorts of creative control of your character even as a player. For example:</p><p></p><p>Character A: Studied and in her off time still teaches at a well-known College of Magic. Absent-minded, always buried in books, shies away from physical confrontation. She likes big, flashy spells like fireball but tries to avoid the squickier forms of magic like necromancy. She's mostly concerned with learning new things, ostensibly for the benefit of society; and seeks out other (civilized) wizards or ancient libraries from which to learn new spells, outside of her experiments in clean, climate-controlled laboratories. Somebody roleplaying this character might describe her spellcasting with fumbling for scrolls (to read incantations from) and other components from enormous sheafs tucked into her backpack, not because this is mechanically necessary but because it's the way the <strong>character</strong> learned how to practice magic; maybe she uses the classic wizard's wand as a focus.</p><p></p><p>Sound very witchy? How about this:</p><p></p><p>Character B: An embittered, crass, and cynical recluse who lives off in the woods alone. Once a famous beauty from a wealthy family, she squandered her youth; and has now come to hate the society that scorned her as youth faded and wealth was wasted (or maybe even stolen by a faithless suitor?). She now looks like an old and weathered hag, with stringy, balding hair and sagging skin. Having no formal education, she taught herself magic by seeking out supernatural creatures and bargaining with or threatening them for secrets; some were nature spirits, but some were undead and/or fiends as well; and that's still how she tries to gain knowledge outside of some experiments on captive animals and people that she believes no one will miss. As survival rates aren't too high, frequent replacements are needed. Her goals are to find some magical way to restore her beauty and youthful vigor; she's not too particular on what the cost might be to others. She favors magic that makes others suffer, helps her learn secrets that others don't want her to know, helps her change how things appear; but disdains evocations and flashier magic as brutish and insubtle (also: secretly because she feels unsatisfied when enemies just die). Somebody roleplaying this character might describe her spellcasting using bloodletting or sacrificing small animals and/or their organs ("Eye of newt, a dog's liver"); or sometimes drinking some foul-spelling brew or applying greasy ointment - not because this is mechanically necessary but because it's the way the <strong>character</strong> learned how to practice magic; maybe she uses a spell component pouch filled with dried herbs and dripping animal organs as her arcane focus.</p><p></p><p>Even if you don't like the idea of "witch as merely the feminine version of wizard", there are undeniably characters within the Harry Potter-verse that fit the classic "witch" archetype. An once again, there's nothing whatsoever that keeps members of the wizard class from practicing different forms of magic. Their subclass specialization might merely represent inborn talent in a particular area or extra secrets uncovered while they were learning magic rather than the focus of their career. A specialist wizard might not even LIKE the school they are technically focused on, choosing very few of them.</p><p></p><p>Yes, warlocks rely frequently on invocations and cantrips when their spell slots run out. However, one might spend most of their time using Misty Visions to confuse and misdirect enemies, and/or the Frostbite spell to inhibit counterattacks; another might focus on adding debuffs to Eldritch Blast; a third might primarily be interested in raw damage (which doesn't seem very "witchy" to <strong>me </strong>personally).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Limited spell selection is a classic problem with or feature of the sorcerer class. Careful spell and metamagic choice is the answer to this; and frequently you'll have only ever have maybe one or two spells for an entire category of magic; which is a different mindset than many other casters. It's still quite easy to support a witch concept - I can provide an example if you're actually interested in one. It's true that that they can't do summoning - but that's not a critical part of the "witch" archetype IMO. They don't have some of the highest-end illusions like Programmed Image or Mirage Arcane, but they have plenty of low-level stuff that works just fine. Phantasmal Force is a very good candidate for twinning btw. They have enough debuffs to make the category functional. Keep in mind their limited spell selection has expanded power and utility due to metamagic. A low or mid-level debuff that inflicts disadvantage on the save via Heightened Spell is frequently more effective than a higher-level spell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowdweller00, post: 8174724, member: 6778479"] What makes a spellcaster "witchy" is their motivation, methodology, and personal style. Not their base skillset. What differentiates an hunter or soldier from a villain in a slasher movie is their choice of prey...plus maybe some scarring, deformity, and history of inbreeding. You have all sorts of creative control of your character even as a player. For example: Character A: Studied and in her off time still teaches at a well-known College of Magic. Absent-minded, always buried in books, shies away from physical confrontation. She likes big, flashy spells like fireball but tries to avoid the squickier forms of magic like necromancy. She's mostly concerned with learning new things, ostensibly for the benefit of society; and seeks out other (civilized) wizards or ancient libraries from which to learn new spells, outside of her experiments in clean, climate-controlled laboratories. Somebody roleplaying this character might describe her spellcasting with fumbling for scrolls (to read incantations from) and other components from enormous sheafs tucked into her backpack, not because this is mechanically necessary but because it's the way the [B]character[/B] learned how to practice magic; maybe she uses the classic wizard's wand as a focus. Sound very witchy? How about this: Character B: An embittered, crass, and cynical recluse who lives off in the woods alone. Once a famous beauty from a wealthy family, she squandered her youth; and has now come to hate the society that scorned her as youth faded and wealth was wasted (or maybe even stolen by a faithless suitor?). She now looks like an old and weathered hag, with stringy, balding hair and sagging skin. Having no formal education, she taught herself magic by seeking out supernatural creatures and bargaining with or threatening them for secrets; some were nature spirits, but some were undead and/or fiends as well; and that's still how she tries to gain knowledge outside of some experiments on captive animals and people that she believes no one will miss. As survival rates aren't too high, frequent replacements are needed. Her goals are to find some magical way to restore her beauty and youthful vigor; she's not too particular on what the cost might be to others. She favors magic that makes others suffer, helps her learn secrets that others don't want her to know, helps her change how things appear; but disdains evocations and flashier magic as brutish and insubtle (also: secretly because she feels unsatisfied when enemies just die). Somebody roleplaying this character might describe her spellcasting using bloodletting or sacrificing small animals and/or their organs ("Eye of newt, a dog's liver"); or sometimes drinking some foul-spelling brew or applying greasy ointment - not because this is mechanically necessary but because it's the way the [B]character[/B] learned how to practice magic; maybe she uses a spell component pouch filled with dried herbs and dripping animal organs as her arcane focus. Even if you don't like the idea of "witch as merely the feminine version of wizard", there are undeniably characters within the Harry Potter-verse that fit the classic "witch" archetype. An once again, there's nothing whatsoever that keeps members of the wizard class from practicing different forms of magic. Their subclass specialization might merely represent inborn talent in a particular area or extra secrets uncovered while they were learning magic rather than the focus of their career. A specialist wizard might not even LIKE the school they are technically focused on, choosing very few of them. Yes, warlocks rely frequently on invocations and cantrips when their spell slots run out. However, one might spend most of their time using Misty Visions to confuse and misdirect enemies, and/or the Frostbite spell to inhibit counterattacks; another might focus on adding debuffs to Eldritch Blast; a third might primarily be interested in raw damage (which doesn't seem very "witchy" to [B]me [/B]personally). Limited spell selection is a classic problem with or feature of the sorcerer class. Careful spell and metamagic choice is the answer to this; and frequently you'll have only ever have maybe one or two spells for an entire category of magic; which is a different mindset than many other casters. It's still quite easy to support a witch concept - I can provide an example if you're actually interested in one. It's true that that they can't do summoning - but that's not a critical part of the "witch" archetype IMO. They don't have some of the highest-end illusions like Programmed Image or Mirage Arcane, but they have plenty of low-level stuff that works just fine. Phantasmal Force is a very good candidate for twinning btw. They have enough debuffs to make the category functional. Keep in mind their limited spell selection has expanded power and utility due to metamagic. A low or mid-level debuff that inflicts disadvantage on the save via Heightened Spell is frequently more effective than a higher-level spell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
So Where my Witches at?
Top