Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So.... why, exactly, is Lay on Hands an at-will?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr_Ruminahui" data-source="post: 4843095" data-attributes="member: 81104"><p>My own thought was that the power was easier to <em>write</em> as an at will that had a restriction on how many times a day it could be used.</p><p> </p><p>That said, it is easier to <em>conceptualize</em> (at least for me) as a power that grants a number of daily powers. If I ever play a palladin, I will create one power card for each use, using the same backer for them as I would for my daily powers.</p><p> </p><p>Rules wise, I think the rule could be written either way and <em>largely </em>be indentical. The difference it would make is for conditions/powers such as dominate which allow someone else to direct your use of an at-will power. If it were written as a daily, a cleric could be dominated to heal one of his enemies, but a paladin could not, which seems a bit incongruous - there seems no background reason why their healing should be treated differently in such a situation. Perhaps Lay on Hands was made a "limited at-will" rather than a "multiple daily" to address this very problem.</p><p> </p><p>That said, I believe this difference was mentioned previously in this thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr_Ruminahui, post: 4843095, member: 81104"] My own thought was that the power was easier to [I]write[/I] as an at will that had a restriction on how many times a day it could be used. That said, it is easier to [I]conceptualize[/I] (at least for me) as a power that grants a number of daily powers. If I ever play a palladin, I will create one power card for each use, using the same backer for them as I would for my daily powers. Rules wise, I think the rule could be written either way and [I]largely [/I]be indentical. The difference it would make is for conditions/powers such as dominate which allow someone else to direct your use of an at-will power. If it were written as a daily, a cleric could be dominated to heal one of his enemies, but a paladin could not, which seems a bit incongruous - there seems no background reason why their healing should be treated differently in such a situation. Perhaps Lay on Hands was made a "limited at-will" rather than a "multiple daily" to address this very problem. That said, I believe this difference was mentioned previously in this thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
So.... why, exactly, is Lay on Hands an at-will?
Top