Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Social Checks in Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iserith" data-source="post: 7044196" data-attributes="member: 97077"><p>I think there's a difference between:</p><p></p><p><strong>DM:</strong> The villain [does a thing]. I bet that makes Ragnar pretty mad, right?</p><p><strong>Tom (playing Ragnar):</strong> Hell yeah it does. "You'll pay for that!"</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p><strong>DM:</strong> The orc screams at it charges you down with its greataxe!</p><p><strong>Tom:</strong> I imagine the orc thinks Ragnar's a threat because he's taller than the orc.</p><p><strong>DM:</strong> Sure, let's go with that. He's got a case of small man syndrome when it comes to you!</p><p></p><p>and</p><p></p><p><strong>Tom:</strong> I want to intimidate the orc.</p><p><strong>DM:</strong> Sure, Charisma (Intimidation) check please.</p><p><strong>Tom:</strong> *rolls* Only a 10.</p><p><strong>DM:</strong> Okay, so you brandish your weapon and let out a fearsome warcry, even louder than the orc's. It is somewhat cowed by your display, but continues its assault unabated.</p><p></p><p>The first two are what I think of when you say your table is "making suggestions" to each other. And that's all good in my book! The third one is a case of the DM overstepping his or her role in my view by establishing what the character is doing because the player's description of what he wanted to do lacks an approach or even a clear statement as to the goal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, in my experience, the DM is the one who does it most often and players often defer to it unless what was established is egregious. I was just remarking last week about how I was watching an actual play podcast where the players objected several times to what the DM said their characters were doing. This sort of situation seems easily avoided by asking the players to be clear about their goals and approaches even in the moment. "I want to intimidate the orc..." for example might be followed up with "Okay, how do you go about that and what specific effect do you hope to bring about?"</p><p></p><p>In fact, this came up for me at my session on Saturday. A player who plays in other games than mine said something along the lines of "Do I think that [XYZ] is going on here?" To which I responded, "I can't tell you what your character thinks. Do you want to <em>do </em>something? What's your goal and approach?" He thought about it and then came back with a goal and approach that I could then adjudicate.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I may start a separate thread on this if I can figure out a way to frame the discussion to explore the approach and its origins without it turning into defense against a perceived attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iserith, post: 7044196, member: 97077"] I think there's a difference between: [B]DM:[/B] The villain [does a thing]. I bet that makes Ragnar pretty mad, right? [B]Tom (playing Ragnar):[/B] Hell yeah it does. "You'll pay for that!" or [B]DM:[/B] The orc screams at it charges you down with its greataxe! [B]Tom:[/B] I imagine the orc thinks Ragnar's a threat because he's taller than the orc. [B]DM:[/B] Sure, let's go with that. He's got a case of small man syndrome when it comes to you! and [B]Tom:[/B] I want to intimidate the orc. [B]DM:[/B] Sure, Charisma (Intimidation) check please. [B]Tom:[/B] *rolls* Only a 10. [B]DM:[/B] Okay, so you brandish your weapon and let out a fearsome warcry, even louder than the orc's. It is somewhat cowed by your display, but continues its assault unabated. The first two are what I think of when you say your table is "making suggestions" to each other. And that's all good in my book! The third one is a case of the DM overstepping his or her role in my view by establishing what the character is doing because the player's description of what he wanted to do lacks an approach or even a clear statement as to the goal. Yes, in my experience, the DM is the one who does it most often and players often defer to it unless what was established is egregious. I was just remarking last week about how I was watching an actual play podcast where the players objected several times to what the DM said their characters were doing. This sort of situation seems easily avoided by asking the players to be clear about their goals and approaches even in the moment. "I want to intimidate the orc..." for example might be followed up with "Okay, how do you go about that and what specific effect do you hope to bring about?" In fact, this came up for me at my session on Saturday. A player who plays in other games than mine said something along the lines of "Do I think that [XYZ] is going on here?" To which I responded, "I can't tell you what your character thinks. Do you want to [I]do [/I]something? What's your goal and approach?" He thought about it and then came back with a goal and approach that I could then adjudicate. Anyway, I may start a separate thread on this if I can figure out a way to frame the discussion to explore the approach and its origins without it turning into defense against a perceived attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Social Checks in Combat
Top