Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Social Combat Rules for 5E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 6968061" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>I really don't think it matters who's saying it if knuckles is physically present and looks willing to do it. Of course if I'm a noble at a court ball surrounded by royal guards, that threat is going to be significantly less worrisome - again, regardless of whom it's coming from.</p><p></p><p>Compare with "I think you want to do me a favor, otherwise that shipment of rare wines you just had come into the docks might have some... in transit breakages in about 5 minutes". Or "Otherwise your daughter might be involved in a nasty riding incident". Or "your wife's childbirth might be... messy".</p><p></p><p>And all of those are far too blunt to be delivered in polite company... which is why it might help to have some decent mental stats.</p><p></p><p></p><p>All of that said: while I think that SOME comparison with physical combat is perhaps appropriate, that's more for the goals and outcomes of said combat and how they contrast with most social schemes.</p><p></p><p>1. Physical combat is resolved as multiple rounds of actions by all participants.</p><p>2. Typically doing nothing is the worst thing you can do: there are exceptions where you might deliberately take a consequence to improve your position, and misjudge (ie accepting an opportunity attack to improve your position, hitting friendlies with an area effect so you can hit more enemies), but you're best off doing <em>something</em> and not simply saying "My character doesn't fight much, I just go skulk in the corner and let the combat guys do this".</p><p>3. While the best fights might have an end result where a single roll becomes crucial, typically more than 10 actions and their assorted rolls would have lead up to that, and it would be hard to say in the wind up which roll by whom would be the crucial one.</p><p>4. Unless the competition is horrendously one-sided, there are consequences for the victor as well as the vanquished.</p><p>5. Multiple traits matter, so different characters and monsters will have a different approach.</p><p>6. Teamwork is more effective than being a lone wolf.</p><p>7. Player decisions matter.</p><p>8. You can usually bring it back from the brink of defeat.</p><p></p><p>I think that if you want to come up with any kind of a social combat system, those are the positive aspects of the combat system you want it to bring across. 4e's skill challenges failed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, and in my view was an awful exercise in pointless rolling as a result. Most skill resolution systems fail in the same way: the best thing for an unskilled character to do is to recuse themselves, and a very limited number of pre-determined rolls dictate success or failure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 6968061, member: 5890"] I really don't think it matters who's saying it if knuckles is physically present and looks willing to do it. Of course if I'm a noble at a court ball surrounded by royal guards, that threat is going to be significantly less worrisome - again, regardless of whom it's coming from. Compare with "I think you want to do me a favor, otherwise that shipment of rare wines you just had come into the docks might have some... in transit breakages in about 5 minutes". Or "Otherwise your daughter might be involved in a nasty riding incident". Or "your wife's childbirth might be... messy". And all of those are far too blunt to be delivered in polite company... which is why it might help to have some decent mental stats. All of that said: while I think that SOME comparison with physical combat is perhaps appropriate, that's more for the goals and outcomes of said combat and how they contrast with most social schemes. 1. Physical combat is resolved as multiple rounds of actions by all participants. 2. Typically doing nothing is the worst thing you can do: there are exceptions where you might deliberately take a consequence to improve your position, and misjudge (ie accepting an opportunity attack to improve your position, hitting friendlies with an area effect so you can hit more enemies), but you're best off doing [i]something[/i] and not simply saying "My character doesn't fight much, I just go skulk in the corner and let the combat guys do this". 3. While the best fights might have an end result where a single roll becomes crucial, typically more than 10 actions and their assorted rolls would have lead up to that, and it would be hard to say in the wind up which roll by whom would be the crucial one. 4. Unless the competition is horrendously one-sided, there are consequences for the victor as well as the vanquished. 5. Multiple traits matter, so different characters and monsters will have a different approach. 6. Teamwork is more effective than being a lone wolf. 7. Player decisions matter. 8. You can usually bring it back from the brink of defeat. I think that if you want to come up with any kind of a social combat system, those are the positive aspects of the combat system you want it to bring across. 4e's skill challenges failed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8, and in my view was an awful exercise in pointless rolling as a result. Most skill resolution systems fail in the same way: the best thing for an unskilled character to do is to recuse themselves, and a very limited number of pre-determined rolls dictate success or failure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Social Combat Rules for 5E
Top