Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Social interactions in 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 3741570" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>If it's a mechanical disincentive to include social resolution rules, then one would think D&D players would choose to avoid physical combat at all costs, given that 90% of the rules are about that.</p><p></p><p>Social mechanics, if anything, are an <em>incentive</em> to include social scenes in your games.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Save for freeform, RPGs have rules. There's no getting around that. And as was pointed out by LostSoul, these rules can be simple enough that mastery should really not be an issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p>IIRC, Gygax's <em>Lejendary Journeys</em> RPG did away with all non-physical stats, based on the assumption that players were going to run their PCs at their own level of aptitude regardless.</p><p></p><p>All I can keep coming back to is something that's hard to express without coming off like an elitist jerk (which is not my intent), but it's true nonetheless. </p><p></p><p>The idea that social mechanics "get in the way" or eliminate roleplaying is <em>wrong</em>. Period. It really shouldn't even be an issue of debate. Games that use them have been around for practically a decade now. Plenty of people in this thread and elsewhere have played them and can give concrete examples of play that, if anything, feature <em>more</em> "roleplaying" than games that don't feature these mechanics.*</p><p></p><p>By including these sorts of mechanics, D&D4e is simply <em>catching up</em> to current RPG design. The only question in our minds should be whether 4e's implementation is enjoyable and productive, or not. Unfortunately, it's hard to talk constructively about that until we actually see the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p>* Noonan's example of the party convincing the lich to help them fight the dragon is a good one. Under 3.5, this would not have happened unless you already knew that your DM was predisposed to allow that sort of play. By 3.5 RAW, killing all the monsters is a far, far more viable option. The <em>presence</em> of the social rules in 4e, however, turned diplomacy into <em>another</em> viable option, thus creating a facet of the adventure's "story" that would probably not have happened otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 3741570, member: 6777"] If it's a mechanical disincentive to include social resolution rules, then one would think D&D players would choose to avoid physical combat at all costs, given that 90% of the rules are about that. Social mechanics, if anything, are an [I]incentive[/I] to include social scenes in your games. Save for freeform, RPGs have rules. There's no getting around that. And as was pointed out by LostSoul, these rules can be simple enough that mastery should really not be an issue. IIRC, Gygax's [I]Lejendary Journeys[/I] RPG did away with all non-physical stats, based on the assumption that players were going to run their PCs at their own level of aptitude regardless. All I can keep coming back to is something that's hard to express without coming off like an elitist jerk (which is not my intent), but it's true nonetheless. The idea that social mechanics "get in the way" or eliminate roleplaying is [I]wrong[/I]. Period. It really shouldn't even be an issue of debate. Games that use them have been around for practically a decade now. Plenty of people in this thread and elsewhere have played them and can give concrete examples of play that, if anything, feature [I]more[/I] "roleplaying" than games that don't feature these mechanics.* By including these sorts of mechanics, D&D4e is simply [I]catching up[/I] to current RPG design. The only question in our minds should be whether 4e's implementation is enjoyable and productive, or not. Unfortunately, it's hard to talk constructively about that until we actually see the rules. * Noonan's example of the party convincing the lich to help them fight the dragon is a good one. Under 3.5, this would not have happened unless you already knew that your DM was predisposed to allow that sort of play. By 3.5 RAW, killing all the monsters is a far, far more viable option. The [I]presence[/I] of the social rules in 4e, however, turned diplomacy into [I]another[/I] viable option, thus creating a facet of the adventure's "story" that would probably not have happened otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Social interactions in 4E
Top