Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tonguez" data-source="post: 403296" data-attributes="member: 1125">The Mongol Empire was not Lawful Evil!If anything it was Lawful NeutralThe whole point of Genghis Khan was that he turned the formerly chaotic system of the mongiol clans on its head &quot;the heavens turned in the sky&quot; and imposed a system of law and honour which created a empire in which crimes of theft and violence were unknown, and peace was guaranteed. Religious and Social tolerance was the order of the day and christina, bhuddistm muslim and shamanistic priests were often entertained in the great Khans tents.Anyway my own people are clan based and yet very lawful as it is based on hereditary hierarchies the difference between lawful clans and lawful empires is scope not degree of law.As to Chaotic societies - I'd tend to look at gangs and wolf packs as models (and the Warlords of Somalia etc) Anyway Polynesia has the full range from Stratified Monarchies, Chaotic Warlords and closeknit clans</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tonguez, post: 403296, member: 1125"] The Mongol Empire was not Lawful Evil! If anything it was Lawful Neutral The whole point of Genghis Khan was that he turned the formerly chaotic system of the mongiol clans on its head "the heavens turned in the sky" and imposed a system of law and honour which created a empire in which crimes of theft and violence were unknown, and peace was guaranteed. Religious and Social tolerance was the order of the day and christina, bhuddistm muslim and shamanistic priests were often entertained in the great Khans tents. Anyway my own people are clan based and yet very lawful as it is based on hereditary hierarchies the difference between lawful clans and lawful empires is scope not degree of law. As to Chaotic societies - I'd tend to look at gangs and wolf packs as models (and the Warlords of Somalia etc) Anyway Polynesia has the full range from Stratified Monarchies, Chaotic Warlords and closeknit clans [/QUOTE]

Verification