Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wulffolk" data-source="post: 7267373" data-attributes="member: 6871450">7 is not 40% greater than 5? You are really trying to argue that is bad math? A +1 and +2 advantage from 6th - 20th level in one secondary Ability is not even worth considering over a +1 in a primary from 14th -20th, especially when a campaign is unlikely to ever even hit that level? Setting that decision before players will not encourage at least some of them to add a 2nd dimension to their character? Encouraging players to be something more than one dimensional is not a step in the right direction of solving the problem? Wow, just wow.As for needing additional rules to support this adjustment, did you not understand what I wrote when I said that this would be part of a collection of rules that are intended to synergize with each other?Seriously? That much has gone over your head? My apologies for the snarkiness, but it bothers me that somebody that is so clearly not tuned in to this discussion is so determined to interfere with others working on something that they consider to be a problem.Hopefully your responses to this thread are a poor example of your general contributions to this forum, and our discussions in other threads can be more productive.</blockquote>